Studies in Literature and Language
Assessment of Reading Comprehension of Saudi Students Majoring in English at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that there has been a continual decline in the average reading ability of college-aged students with approximately one third of a four-year college students considered “at risk” for low academic attainment. The current study assesses English reading comprehension of senior Saudi students majoring in English and Translation in fall 2012 at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia. The study, moreover, investigates the potential impacts of students’ age and GPAs on their reading comprehension. One hundred three students participated in the study in which quantitative method was used. Two reading passages with different length and topics were given to the students followed by 10 multiple questions for each passage. Major findings of the study indicate that 1) participants of the study showed an overall low reading comprehension X= 9.8, 2) GPA was found a statistically significant factor that impacted students’ reading comprehension, 3) students’ age, on the other hand, had no significant effect, 4) reading courses at the mentioned department seemed to generally focus on reading strategies whereas they should have adequately considered comprehension instruction since reading and decoding words without comprehension becomes meaningless.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alshumaimeri, Y. A. (2008). Perceptions and attitudes toward using CALL in English classrooms among Saudi secondary EFL teachers. The JALT CALL Journal, 44 (2), 29-66.
Al Turki, U., & Dufuaa, S. (2003). Performance measures for academic departments .International Journal of Educational Management, 17 (7), 330 – 338.
Baki, R. (2004). Gender-segregated education in Saudi Arabia: its impact on social norms and the Saudi labor market. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12 (28). Retrieved March 17, 2013 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n28/.
Bean, J., & Metzner, B. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55, 485-540.
Beeson, S. (2001). Assign it and they will read! Or will they? Reading activities of nursing students. Nurse Educator, 25(6), 273-281.
Breneman, D. (1998). Remediation in higher education: Its extent and cost. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings paper on education policy 1998 (pp.359-383). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Buly, M. R., & Valencia, S. W. (2002). Below the bar: Profiles of students who fail state reading assessments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2(3), 219- 240.
Carrell, P. L., & Grabe, W. (2002). Reading. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied Linguistics (pp. 233-250). London: Arnold.
Chege, E. W. (2012). Reading comprehension and it’s relationship with academic performance among standard eight pupils in rural Machakos. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation (Kenyatta University).
Cook, J. (2006). The relationship between reading comprehension skill assessment methods and academic success for first semester students in a selected Bachelor of Science in Nursing program in Texas (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Texas A & M University.
Cohen, G. (1988). Age differences in memory for text: Production deficiency or processing limitation? In L. L. Light & D. M. Burke (Eds.), Language, memory, and aging. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crane, L., Poziemski, C., & Gustafson, J. (1998). Assessing motivational aspects of reading in developmental reading courses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Illinois Association for Institutional Research, Findlay. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED424890).
Dearman, C., & Davis, D. (1990). Reading abilities of master’s students versus readability of textbooks. Journal of Nursing Education, 29(9), 406-411.
K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A.E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction ( pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Hardin, K. (2014, January 12). What is a good TOEFL Score? Retrieved from http://magoosh.com/toefl/2014/what-is-a-good-toefl-score/
Higgs, Z. (1984). Predicting success in nursing: From prototype to pragmatics. Journal of Nursing Research, 6, 77-93.
Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology on learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly, 4(1), 183-210.
Khalafy, H. (2012). Qassim University Bulletin: Humanitarian and Community service Colleges. Buraidah: Qassim University.
Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Cross-linguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57(1), 1-44.
Krieger, Z. (2007). Saudi Arabia puts its billions behind western style higher education. The chronicle of higher education, 54(3). Retrieved December 13, 2012 from http://www.viet-studies.info/Saudi_education_CHE.pdf
Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9 (5), 178-181.
Leach, J., Scarborough, H., & Rescorla, L. (2003). Late-emerging reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 211-224.
Martial, V., Michel, H., Pierre, F., Marie-Anne, S., Yves, B., Raymond, B., Xavier, S. (2010). Cognitive Mediators of Age-Related Differences in Language Comprehension and Verbal Memory Performance. Journal on Normal and Dysfunctional Development, 6 (1), 32-55.
National Center for Education Statistics (2005). The nation’s report card: Reading 2005 (NCES 2006-451). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC. Retrieved January 23, 2013, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2005/2006451.pdf
National Center for Education Statistics (2005). National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Ovando, C. J. (2005). Language diversity and education. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (5th ed., pp. 289-313). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Pintrich, P. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 219-225.
Pugh, S., Pawan, F., & Antommarchi, C. (2000). Academic literacy and the new college learner. In R. Flippo & D. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of collegiate reading and study strategy research (pp. 25-42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roxas, J. A. (2011). Reading proficiency and its relationship to student’s English academic achievement. Retrieved on September 2, 2013 from http://repository.donbosco.net/title/search/233
Sharpe, P. J. (1999). How to prepare for the TOEFL. New York: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc.
Snow, K. (2002). Reading for Understanding toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Education.
Stotsky, S., Goering, C., & Jolliffe, D. (2010). Literary study in grades 9, 10, and 11 in Arkansas. Retrieved March 13, 2013 from http://coehp.uark.edu/literary_study.pdf
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). the condition of education: 2002. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Upton, T. A. (1997). First and second language use in reading comprehension strategies of Japanese ESL students. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal 3 (1). Retrieved January 10, 2010 from http://tesl-ej.org/ej09/a3.html
TOEFL Test and Score Data. (2012). Retrieved March 2013 from www.ets.org/toefl
Thomas, J., & Rohwer, W. (1986). Academic studying: The role of learning strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 19-41.
Worrell, P. J. (1990). Metacognition: Implications for instruction in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education, 29(4), 170-175.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Share us to: 
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard
Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net，or sll@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org
Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture 
