Management Science and Engineering
Analysis of Stakeholder Influence: A Perception of Software Engineering Projectsin Nigeria
Abstract
Software Engineering Project (SEP) failure has been an issue of concern to software engineers and one of the warning signals is non-involvement of stakeholders. For a project to succeed it is essential to know how a stakeholder can take action, get involved, and the level of stakeholder’s involvement in the project. This study investigated the level of influence stakeholders have on software engineering projects in Nigeria and prioritized the stakeholders based on their level of influence. This involved analyzing 130 questionnaires collected from three different sectors namely tertiary institutions, government ministries and government agencies. The respondents rated the stakeholders involved in the selected projects according to stakeholder attributes: Attitude, Vested Interest, Power, Proximity, Legitimacy, Urgency, and Knowledge. The result showed that project sponsors and project team have more influence on the project than any other stakeholder. This revealed that project sponsors and project teams control software engineering projects in Nigeria.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and practice. Long Range Planning, 44, 179-196.
Assudani, R., & Kloppenborg, T. J. (2010). Managing stakeholders for project management success: An emergent model of stakeholders. Journal of General Management, 35(3), 67-68.
Baida, Z. (2001). Stakeholders and their concerns in software architecture. Technology Journal of Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 68-82.
Boonstra, A. (2010). Identifying and managing stakeholders in enterprise information system projects. In M. M. Cruz-Cunha (Ed.), Social, managerial and organizational dimensions of enterprise information systems (pp.313-328). Hershey-PA, USA: IGI-Global.
Bourne, L., & Walker, D. (2006). Using a visualising tool to study stakeholder influence: Two Australian examples. The Project Management Journal, 37(1), 5-21.
Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matters. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21-53.
Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. (2008). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management (7th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Chandra, H., Indarto, I, Wiguna, P. A., & Kaming, P. (2012). Model of stakeholder influence on project success: Finding from construction project in East Java. International Journal of Academic Research, 4 (2), 41-45.
Chinyio, E. A., & Akintoye, A. (2008). Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: Findings from the UK. Construction Management and Economics, 591-599.
Clarkson, M. B. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 39-48.
Cleland, D. I., & Ireland, R. L. (2002). Project management: Strategic design and implementation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. London: Pitman.
Frooman, J., & Murrell, A. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: The roles of structural and demographic determinants. Business and Society, 44 (1), 3-31.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management, 22(4), 853-886.
Nguyen, N., Skitmore, M., & Wong, J. K. (2009). Stakeholder impact analysis of infrastructure project management in developing countries: A study of perception of project managers in state-owned engineering firms in Vietnam. Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), 1129-1140.
OGC. (2007). Managing success programmes. London: TSO.
Olander, S., & Landin, A. (2005). Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. International Journal of Project Management , 23, 321-328.
Smith, L. W. (2000). Project clarity through stakeholder analysis. Journal of Defense Software Engineering. Retrieved 2015, March 21 from http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/2000/12/smith.html
Susser, B. (2012). How to effectively manage IT project risks. Journal of Management and Business, 2, 41-55.
Tarawneh, H. (2011). A suggested theoretical framework for software project success. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 646-651.
Vos, J. F., & Achterkamp, M. C. (2006). Stakeholder identification in innovation projects – Going beyond classification. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2), 161-178.
Yang, J., Shen, Q., Ho, M., Drew, S., & Chan, A. (2009b). Exploring critical success factors for stakeholder management in construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 15 (4), 337-348.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/9531
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Adanma Cecilia Eberendu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Share us to: 
Reminder
We are currently accepting submissions via email only.
The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to mse@cscanada.net，or mse@cscanada.org for consideration.
We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; mse@cscanada.net; mse@cscanada.org
Articles published in Management Science and Engineering are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING Editorial Office
Address:1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures 
