Research on Implication and Intelligence Participation

Li XU, Juan LI

Abstract


The inference of implication can not separate from intelligence participation in that the process of intelligence participation needs the participation of the thinking of the brain. And the real meaning which the speaker wants to express requires the hearer to think, judge and infer. Therefore, they are interdependent. Moreover, the thesis summarizes the reasons for leading to the misunderstanding o f implication. And these reasons can provide the point of penetration for the hearer so as to analyze the implication correctly. In addition, the thesis also summarizes the relationship between intelligence participation and implication. It can guide the hearer to take an active attitude and correct methods to infer the implication through the analysis of the relationship between them. And it will finally realize successful communication


Keywords


Implication; Intelligence participation; Language

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, J. R. (1983). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York, NY: W. H. freeman.

Cai, S. P. (2000). Discourse implication. Journal of Lujiang University, (3).

George, Y. (2000). Pragmatics. China: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Huang, G. W. (1996). Three kinds of knowledge of speech generation and understanding. Foreign Language and Foreign Language Teaching, (6), 1-8.

Huang, Y. (2009). Pragmatics. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Leech, G. (1974). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Liu, S. Z., & Zhong, G. S. (2003). Questioning about “dichotomy” of pragmatic failure. Journal of Guangxi Normal University.

Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (2001). The Commercial Press.

Lyon, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol.2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richard, C. (1999). Psychology: The science of mind and behavior. London: Hodder & Stoughton Educational.

Roach, P. (1983). English phonetics and phonology. Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Tan, J. Z .(2004). Analysis of ambiguity of English homophones. Journal of Zhengzhou Institute of Aeronautics Industry Management,

Vygotsky. L. S. (1962). The genetic roots of thought and language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The M.L.T. Press.

Wu, F. W., & Wang, J. J. (2002). On the role and participation degree of intelligence influence during the constructing good cognitive structure of mathematics. Teaching and Management, (1), 70.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Share us to:   

 

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard

Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net，or  sll@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture