Junior High School Teachers’ Feedback Giving and Perceptions of the CSE Writing Scale
Abstract
Chinese EFL learners’ deficiencies in writing have become increasingly apparent in their secondary education, especially in the originality of ideas and the logic of arguments. However, they may not be made aware of this as many teachers still use traditional feedback such as a single score to mark and report on students’ performance. The Writing Scale of China’s Standards of English Language Ability (hereinafter referred to as the CSE Writing Scale) released in 2018 provides a framework of reference against which Chinese students’ English writing ability can be assessed. It consists of descriptors of writing ability in different contexts and genres. It makes detailed and analytical feedbacking possible and has far-reaching implications for the development of formative assessment in English teaching. Nevertheless, to date, there has been scarce empirical research as to whether teachers actually use the Writing Scale in teaching and whether they are able to utilize it in an effective way.
This study aims to investigate the current situation of feedback giving in junior high school and teachers’ views of and attitudes towards the application of the CSE Writing Scale. Through a questionnaire and interviews with the teachers, the study revealed three major findings. Firstly, although teachers were aware of the importance of giving feedback on students’ writing, they had problem providing individualized comments on student writing. Secondly, students had difficulty understanding teachers’ feedback. Lastly, teachers were generally not familiar with the CSE Writing Scale and concerned whether it could be effectively used in the process of feedback giving. Conclusions are drawn together with implications and recommendations for teachers to resolve the problems identified.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
An, W., & Wu, Y. (2020). A survey of vocational college students’ English writing ability based on the Chinese English Competence Scale. Education Teaching Forum, 7, 381-385.
Bader, M., Burber, T., Iversen, S. H., & Varga, Z. (2019). Student perspectives on formative feedback as part of writing portfolios. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 1017-1028.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
Burner, T. (2015). Formative assessment of writing in English as a foreign language. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(6), 626-648.
Feng, L., & Yan, M. (2018). Future application of Scales of China’s Standards of English for English teachers in China: Problems and solutions. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 05, 50-56.
He, L., & Zhang, H. (2017). An economics approach to China’s Standards of English (CSE). Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 5, 743-753.
He, Q., & Xiao, Y. (2019). Using China’s Standards of English Language Ability in foreign language teaching with a focus on CSE Writing Ability Scale. Foreign Language Testing and Teaching, 4, 11-20.
Lee, I. (2007). Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning?. Assessing Writing, 12(3), 180-198.
Lee, I. (2011). Formative assessment in EFL writing: An exploratory case study. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 18(1), 99-111.
Lee, I. & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 34-50.
Lewis, M. (2007). Giving Feedback in Language Classes. Beijing: People’s Education Press.
Li, X. (2019). Application of formative assessment in senior high school English writing teaching. Journal of Teaching and Management, 03, 106-109.
Li, Y. (2020). Enlightenment of China’s Standards of English Ability on teachers’ written feedback. Modern Communication, 14, 18-19.
Liang, H. (2020). Research on the application of China’s Standards of English Language Ability in English writing teaching. Journal of Heilongjiang Institute of Teacher Development, 2, 141-144.
Lin, Z., & Zhou, S. (2011). A study of teacher feedback types and characteristics in middle school English classes. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 03, 15-22+34.
Stevens, D. D. & Levi, A. J. (2013). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms. Alexandria: ASCD.
Wang, Y. (2021). Application of CSE Writing Expression strategies into college English text summary writing. Foreign Language Testing and Teaching, 1, 35-40.
Wingate, U. (2010). The impact of formative feedback on the development of academic writing. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 519-533.
Yu, S., Geng, F., Liu, C., & Zheng, Y. (2021). What works may hurt: The negative side of feedback in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 54, 100850.
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to students’ writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79-101.
Zhang, W., & Deng, H. (2019). Development of China’s Standards of English Language Ability (CSE): Taking the construction of descriptor pool for the Writing Ability Scale as an example. Foreign Language Testing and Teaching, 04, 1-10+39.
Zhao, Q. (2009). A review to the theories and applications about rating standards of the domestic writing tests. Journal of China Examinations, 08, 43-48.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/12782
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard
Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or sll@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org
Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture