Metaphor and Framing in Cognition and Practice: Take Metaphors for AIDS as Examples

Ying CHEN, Junzi ZHOU

Abstract


The notion of “framing” as an important function of metaphor can be applied to the related perspective: cognitive and practice-based. We analyze these perspectives by applying it to a corpus-based study according to Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and English Web 2015 (enTenTen15) Corpus in Sketch Engine of illness-related for AIDS concordances and collocations and demonstrate its value to both theory and practice. By analyzing the data which includes violence-related metaphors for AIDS and through the application of this framework, we can find that there are merits in applying the notion of framing at different levels of generality in metaphor analysis (conceptual metaphors and linguistic metaphors), so that we can have a deeper understanding of cognition and framing in AIDS. Metaphor has characteristics of salience and mutual reactions, therefore, this article tries to study metaphor from the perspective of frame theory so that it can provide a new angle for researching metaphor. According to theoretical and practical advantages of taking two levels into account when considering the use of metaphor for communicating about sensitive topics such as AIDS and people’s positive, negative or neutral attitudes towards AIDS. We emphasize that there is a need for “rich” definition of framing when evaluating, comprehending and commenting.


Keywords


AIDS; Framing theory; Conceptual metaphor; Illness as metaphor

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bateson, G. (1987). A theory of play and fantasy. In G. Bateson (Ed.). Steps to an ecology of mind (pp.183-198). London: Jason Aronson Inc.

Croft, W., & Cruse, D. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press.

Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2006). The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, (4), 671-690.

Cameron, L., Low, G., & Maslen, R. (2010). Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In L. Cameron, & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp.116-146). Equinox.

Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. London: Cambridge University Press.

Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, (4), 51-58.

Fillmore, C. (1975). An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In C. H. Cogen, G. Thurgood Thompson, K. Whistler, & J. Wright (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp.123-131). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Fillmore, C. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, (6), 222-254.

Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.

Gibbs, R., & Cameron, L. (2008). The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, (9), 64-75.

Gibbs, R., & Franks, H. (2002). Embodied metaphor in women’s narratives about their experiences with cancer. Health Communication, (2), 139-165.

Goffmann, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to face behavior. Aldine Publishing Company.

Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of California.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. (2001). Metaphorik.de, 11 September 2001. Available at http://www. metaphorik.de/aufsaetze/lakoff-september11.htm. Accessed May 2016.

Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. Hartford: Chelsea Green Publishing.

Miller, R. S. (2010). Speak up: 8 words and phrases to ban in ontology. Oncology Times, (12), 20.

Minsky, M. A. (1975). A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In The Psychology of Computer Vision (P. H. Winston, Ed.). New York: McGraw- Hill.

Reisfield, G., & Wilson, G.. (2004). Use of metaphor in the discourse on cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Ritchie, L. D. (2013). Metaphor. Cambridge University Press.

Rom WN, Markowitz SB. (2007). Environmental and occupational medicine (4th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge University Press.

Semino, E. Z., Demjén., J. D., Koller., V., Payne., S., Hardie, H., & Rayson, P. (2017). The online use of violence and journey metaphors by patients with cancer, as compared with health professionals: a mixed methods study. BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care, (1), 60-66.

Semino, E., Demjén, Z., & Demmen, J. (2018). An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics, (5), 628-631.

Sontag, S. (1979). Illness as metaphor. New York, Doubleday.

Sullivan, K. (2013). Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. John Benjamins.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11785

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Junzi ZHOU

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share us to:   

 

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard

Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net，or  sll@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture