“Naturalness” in Emily Dickinson’s Poems Through a Contemporary Chinese Lens

Xiaodan WANG

Abstract


Great literary works withstand the test of varied ages, cultures, and philosophies, displaying their unique charms from multiple perspectives. In recent years, postmodern theories have been applied to the analysis of Emily Dickinson’s poetry. Readers conduct close readings in indefinite ways, without referring to the cultural and historical contexts or information derived from the poet herself. At the same time, critics from all over the world reexamine Dickinson’s poems from the perspectives of diverse cultures, the Chinese culture included. However, Postmodernism and Chinese Daoism, two seemingly unrelated philosophies, could collaborate to demonstrate a different way of interpreting Dickinson’s poems. This paper selects three of Dickinson’s representative poems discussing the issue of “naturalness”, construes the texts respectively from a combined western postmodern and Chinese perspective, and thus offers a different angle to reevaluate Dickinson’s poetry.


Keywords


Great literary works withstand the test of varied ages, cultures, and philosophies, displaying their unique charms from multiple perspectives. In recent years, postmodern theories have been applied to the analysis of Emily Dickinson’s poetry. Readers cond

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ames, R. T., & Hall, D. L. (Trans.) (2003). Daodejing: “Making this life significant”. New York: Random House.

Ayelsworth, G. (2019). “Postmodernism”. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. N.p. Retrieved April 20, 2019, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/postmodernism

Bennett, P. B. (2002). Emily Dickinson and her American woman poet peers. In W. Martin (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Emily Dickinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cameron, S. (1979). Lyric time: Dickinson and the limits of genre. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Chang, Y. (2007). A survey of American literature. Tianjin: Nankai University Press.

Cleary, T. (Trans.) (1998). The essential Tao: An initiation into the heart of Taoism through the authentic Tao Te Ching and the inner teachings of Chuang Tzu. New York: Harper Collins.

Culler, J. (2007). On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. New York: Cornell University Press.

Deppman, J. (2005, spring). Trying to think with Emily Dickinson. The Emily Dickinson Journal, 14(1), 84-103.

Dickinson, E. (1960). The complete poems of Emily Dickinson (T. H. Johnson, Ed.). Boston: Little Brown & Co.

Franklin, R. W. (Ed.). (1999). The poems of Emily Dickinson: reading edition. Boston: Harvard University Press.

Grabher, G., Hagenbüchle, R., & Miller, C. (2005). The Emily Dickinson handbook. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

Hamill, S., & Seaton, J. P. (Trans.) (1998). The essential Chuang Tzu. Boston: Shambhala Publications.

Howe, S. (1985). My Emily Dickinson. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.

Kang, Y. (2012, Sept.). Dickinson’s Orient. Foreign Literature. 5, 33-39.

Ladin, J. (5, 2010). Where the meanings are: Emily Dickinson, prosody, and post-modernist poetics. Versification.

Littlejohn, R. L. (2009). Daoism: An introduction. New York: I. B. Tauris & Co Ltd.

Mitchell, D. & Stuart, M. (2009). The international reception of Emily Dickinson. London: Continuum.

Porter, D. (1981). Dickinson: The modern idiom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Shi, J. (2015, Jan.). A study on Emily Dickinson’s poetry with philosophies of Lao Zi and Zhuang Zi. China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. Retrieved April 21, 2019 from http://www.cnki.net

White, F. D. (2008). Approaching Emily Dickinson: Critical currents and crosscurrents since 1960. New York: Camden House.

Ye, L., & Zhu, L. (2008). Insights into Chinese culture (S. Zhang & H. Chen, Trans.). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11379

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Xiaodan Wang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


 

Online Submissionhttp://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard

Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or  sll@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mailoffice@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture