A Comparative Study Between Chinese and English Refusals
Abstract
This article adopts the Discourse Completion Test as the data collection instrument, taking 80 students as its subjects. It mainly focuses on the pragmatic strategies between the two groups, that is to say, the different refusal strategies of the interlocutors. The investigation shows that differences still exist in term of the degree of indirectness. Besides, differences still exist in term of the degree of indirectness. Then it draws the conclusion that the differences of refusal speech act are based on different cultures, furthermore it lays the basis for the the English teaching and second language acquisition.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & G. Kasper. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: request and apology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
He, Z. R., Chen, X. R. (2004). Contemporary pragmatics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching Research Press.
Levension, S. C. (2005). Pragmatics. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press & Cambridge University Press.
Li, W. (2005). Comparison study between Chinese and English refusals. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, (21).
Ma, Y. L. (2001). A study on the strategies universals of Chinese and American refusals. Journal of Xi’an Foreign Language University, (6).
Mey, J. L. (2005). Pragmatics: an introduction (2nd ed.). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press.
Pan, M. (2005). Comparative studies on refusals strategies between Chinese and American speech act. Heihe Journal, (5).
Samovar, L. A. (2005). Communication between cultures. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics. London Longman
Wang, A. H. (2001). A survey on Chinese and American speech act of refusals. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (5).
Wang, A. H., & Wu, G. L. (2005). A survey of Refusal in Chinese and American English. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, (6).
Zhao, J. (2004). A cross-cultural study on refusal strategies. Southwest Jiaotong University.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11316
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Xibo Tian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard
Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or sll@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org
Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture