Readability Assessment of Business English Textbooks

Wenling CHEN

Abstract


Business English: An Integrated Course published in 2010 is the first series of textbook compiled in accordance with the National Teaching Curriculum for BA Program in Business English of China. This paper uses Flesch Reading Ease to conduct a readability assessment of its textual difficulty. The quantitative analysis indicates that there is room for improvement: 1) the four books in the series lack a scientific hierarchy of readability, 2) the readability in the same book covers an unreasonably wide range, 3) some texts are too difficult. These defects prove the important role readability can play in the compilation of business English textbooks. This research is hoped to shed light on the use of readability assessment in the compilation, revision and evaluation of business English textbooks.

 


Keywords


Readability; Flesch Reading Ease; Business English textbook

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bailin, A., & Grafstein, A. (2001). The linguistic assumptions underlying readability formulae: a critique. Language & Communication, 21, 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(01)00005-2.

Breen, M. P. & Candlin, C. N. (1987). Which materials: a consumer’s and designer’s guide. In L. E. Sheldon (Ed.). ELT textbooks and materials: problems in evaluation and development. London: Modern English Publications in association with the British Council.

Bruce, B., & Rubin, A. (1988). Readability formulas: matching tool and Task. in A. Davison and G. M. Green (Eds.), Linguistic Complexity and Text Comprehension: Readability Issues Reconsidered. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cunningsworth, A. (2002). Choosing your coursebook. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Flesch, R. F. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, (32). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532.

Gagne, R.M. (1985). The condition of learning & theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Hamsik, M. J. (1984). Reading, readability, and the ESL reader. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida University, U. S. Retrieved November 23, 2018, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=749006291&sid=1&ftm=2&clientld=46449&RQT=309&VName=P.

Hou, Y. P. (2012). Evaluating the content validity of the innovated TEM4 reading in recent seven years. Journal of Hebei University (Philosophy and Social Science), 4, 143-147.

Kondur, J. (2006). Using part of speech structure of text in the prediction of its readability. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Texas, Arlington, U.S. Retrieved November 13, 2018, from http://proquest.umi.com/pdqweb?did=1216761731&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientld=46449&PQT=309&VName=PQD.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: issues and implications. London: Longman.

Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1992). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Longman.

Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, (42). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.4.237.

Sun, T. Y. (2018). Readability assessment of TEM4 reading in recent five years. Retrieved November 23, 2018, from http://www.doc88.com/p-8425048156062.html.

Zeng, G. X., & Zhu, X. M. (2012). Readability test in college English reading comprehension question designing—an example of Flesch / Flesch-Kincaid readability tests. Journal of Harbin University, 2, 90-95.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11280

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Wenling CHEN

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share us to:   

 

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard

Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net，or  sll@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture