Shared Knowledge and Communication: A Pragmatic Analysis of Taofiq Azeez’s Brigandage
Abstract
Pragmatics is the study of meaning as used in context and interpreted by the listener. Bearing the focus of Pragmatics in mind, this work adopts Cooperative Principles formulated by Paul Grice to analyse Taofiq Azeez’s Brigandage. The aim is to see how the cooperation between the characters facilitates communication in the text and to determine the extent to which the characters in the text observe the principles formulated by Paul Grice. This work also identifies the implicature generated by the characters as they break the maxims. That is, what meaning a character implies as he fails to observe the maxim(s). Some data were collected from the text and analysed. It was observed that interlocutors, as represented by the characters, strive to cooperate with each other but, for obvious reasons, flout the maxims; thus, implying additional meaning beyond what is explicitly said. The study revealed that non-observance of maxims does not impair communication owing to the fact that listeners, through shared knowledge, infer the implied meaning from the speaker’s contribution and this sustains communication.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allot, N. (2010) Key terms in pragmatics. New York: Continuum.
Azeez, T. (2002) Brigandage. Abeokuta: Jedidiah Publishers.
Bossan, R. (2017). History and scope of pragmatics. in G. Ibileye (Ed.), Discourse analysis and pragmatics: Issues in theory and practice (pp.47-69). Nigeria: Malthouse Press Limited.
Dijk, T. V. (1992). Text and context explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London and New York: Longman.
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. in P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds). Syntax and semantics. New York: Academic Press.
Leech, G. N (1980). Exploration in semantics and pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martinich, A. P. (1984) Communication and reference. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Olatunde, J. A. (2017). Speech act analysis of president goodluck jonathan and general Mohammed Buhari’s 31st March 2015 –telephone conversation. in G. Ibileye (Ed.), Discourse analysis and pragmatics: Issues in theory and practice. Nigeria: Malthouse Press.
Osisanwo, W. (2008) Introduction to discourse analysis and pragmatics. Lagos: Femolus-Fetop Publishers.
Rundell, M., et al (Eds). (2007) Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners. United Kingdom: Macmillan Publishers.
Shannon C. E., & Weaver, W. (1964). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.
Ternad-Abah, N. M. (2016). A pragmatic analysis of religion-induced utterances in selected discourses of some students of Ahmadu Bello University Zaria. AJE: Abuja Journal of English, 5(1). Nigeria: Chartered Graphic Press.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11279
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Folorunso Oloruntobi, James Boaner Olusaanu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard
Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or sll@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org
Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture