T. S. Eliot’s Prufrock: An Archetypal Mock-Modern Tragic Hero

Rashed Daghamin

Abstract


Literature is a mirror of society and life, and T.S. Eliot is a keen painter who dexterously sketches the true picture of the sterile modern world. Eliot outlines and delineates the anxiety, decline, ambiguity, fragmentation, paralysis and disorder of his age, the early decades of the 20th century, through a meticulous, keen and realistic delineation of Prufrock. Eliot portrays Prufrock’s tragic and farcical story; the story of frustration, failure, debasement, paralysis, emasculation, uncertainty, conscious-inertia, self-effacement, and spiritual infertility. Eliot also, through Prufrock, delineates the utter emptiness of modern man and the sterility and hollowness of the western civilization. Prufrock speaks, suffers, and agonizes on behalf of the twentieth century man. His agonies are generalized, a theme that Eliot tends to present and emphasize. The poem exemplifies all presumable techniques and themes of Modernism, such as fragmentation, allusion, juxtaposition, uncertainty, ambiguity, inertia, hyperconsciousness, imagery, symbolism, and condemnation of the sterility of the modern world. This research paper critically examines the pathetic and tragic life, concerns, deterioration and disintegration of Prufrock. The paper is a deep psychological analysis of the mind and psyche of a neurite, coward, psychosexually paralyzed hero who is prone to inferiority complex, hyperconsciousness, self-effacement, dehumanization, and paralysis. The state of mental, psychological and physical paralysis evidently shapes Prufrock’s fragmented and sophisticated thoughts and actions. Through a meticulous and objective analysis, this paper critically examines the poets’ philosophical dialectic, and it demonstrates that Prufrock is an archetypal, mock-modern tragic hero.


Keywords


Prufrock; Eliot; Modernism; Mock-tragic hero; Paralysis; Debasement; Inertia; Anxiety

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Jumaily, A. (2013). T. S. Eliot’s Tragic Strategy in: The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock. New York Science Journal, 6(7), 111-122. Retrieved from http://www.sciencepub.net/newyork

Blythe, H., & Sweet, C. (2004). Eliot’s The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock. The Explicator, 62(2), 108-110.

Cox, C. B., & A. E. Dyson, (1979). Modern poetry: Studies in practical criticism. London: Edward Arnold.

Eliot, T. S. (1969). The complete poems and plays of T. S. Eliot. London: Faber and Faber Limited.

Eliot, T. S. (1933). A Commentary. Criterion, 12(48), 468–73.

Eliot, T. S. (1983). The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock. The Waste Land and other poems. London: Faber and Faber.

Guerin, L., et al. (Eds.) (2005). A handbook of critical approaches to literature (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hussein, S. (2015). T. S. Eliot’s construction of Prufrock as a prototypical modern hero in “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock’’: An appraisal. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 12(2), 130-134. Retrieved from http:// www.iasir.net

Hakac, J. (1972). The Yellow Fog of “Prufrock”. The Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association, 26(2), 52-54.

Isaacs, J. (1952). The Background of Modern Poetry. London: Edward Arnold.

Jain, M. (2010). A critical reading of the selected poems of T. S. Eliot. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Levis, F. R. (1961). T. S. Eliot. New Bearings in English Poetry. London: Chatto and Winds.

Spender, S. (1986). Eliot. Great Britain: Fontana Press.

South, B. C. (1981). Prufrock and other observation. The selected poems of T. S. Eliot. London and Boston: Faber and Faber.

Shakespeare, W. (1992). The tragedy of Hamlet, prince of Denmark (New Folger’s ed.). New York: Washington Square Press/Pocket Books.

Williamson, G. (1971). Prufrock and other observations. A reader’s guide to T. S. Eliot. London: Thames and Hudson.

Waggoner, H. (1984). American poets from the puritans to the present. Louisiana: Louisiana University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11111

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Ahmad Daghamin Dr.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


 

Online Submissionhttp://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard

Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or  sll@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mailoffice@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture