Teaching of English Writing for Ph.D. Graduates Based on Output-Driven Hypothesis

Lun WANG, Guiqi WU

Abstract


The theory of output-driven hypothesis is especially appropriate for second language teaching, because language needs practicing. The teachers of Ph.D. graduates’ English writing should reform the former curriculum system, and through assigning interesting writing tasks, optimizing the content of writing instruction, discussing for writing input, providing writing feedbacks, and establishing a comprehensive evaluation system, their writing ability is sure to be enhanced. 


Keywords


Output-driven hypothesis; English writing; teaching; Ph.D. graduates.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, J. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, (89), 369-406.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Chen, W. K. (2010). Research on reform of writing instruction for English major based on output-driven hypothesis. Journal of Henan Institute of Education (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (3), 120-122.

Hanaoka, O. (2007). Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task. Language Teaching Research, (11), 459-479.

Harmer, J. (1988). The practice of English language teaching. New York: Longman.

Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis. Studies of Second Language Acquisition, (24), 541-577.

Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, (24), 168-196.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issue and Implications. London: Longman.

Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Liu, G. (2009). Enlightenment of output-driven hypothesis on China’s English teaching. Journal of Anshun University, (12), 70-72.

Lou, J. M. (2015). Exploration on teaching mode for integration of college English reading and writing based on output-driven hypothesis. Industrial & Science Tribune, (6), 122-123.

Scovel, T. (1998). Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shi, K. & Ouyang K. (2017). Teaching modes of general English for graduates from the view of output-driven hypothesis. Journal of Lanzhou Institute of Education, (8), 130-132.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.). Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 235-253．

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning[A]. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (eds.). Principles and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Hornour of H G Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125-144.

Wang, C. X. & Chen X. H. (2016). Experimental research on cultivation of writing ability based on output-driven hypothesis. Research in Teaching, (5), 62-66.

Wang, J. P. (2010). Course reform of business English writing of higher vocational education from the view of output-driven hypothesis. Journal of Hubei University of Economics (Humanities and Social Sciences), (10), 187-188.

Wang, W. Q. (2013). Reform and exploration of integration of college English reading and writing based on output-driven hypothesis. Chongqing and World, (5), 58-62.

Wang, Y. Y. (2015). Research on teaching mode of efficient writing guided by output-driven and input-based hypothesis. Education Teaching Forum, (6), 144-145.

Wen, Q. F. (2008). Output-driven hypothesis and curriculum reform for English majors to enhance professional skills. Foreign Language World, (2), 2-9.

Wen, Q. F. (2013). Application of output-driven hypothesis in college English teaching: thoughts and suggestions. Foreign Language World, (6), 14-22.

Zhang, J. W. (2012). Exploration on the mode of college English teaching guided by output-driven hypothesis. Changchun University of Science and Technology.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10527

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jingyi SUN

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share us to:   

 

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard

Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net，or  sll@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture