The Handmaid’s Tale Through the Lens of Marxism
Abstract
In Margaret Atwood’s novel The Handmaid’s Tale, the handmaid of the title is most frequently viewed by critics as a symbol of female marginality whose innocence and sincerity expose the hypocrisy and artificiality of patriarchal society. We will argue that Atwood goes beyond establishing Handmaids as simply one side of a dialectical opposition between matriarchal society and patriarchal society. The handmaids additionally stand as a symbol of proletariat, subjugated by the bourgeoisie to the point of slavery, harshly indoctrinated in a psychologically-damaging fashion, and are denied the basic freedoms. From a sociological perspective, Atwood’s story is an appreciated instrument to scrutinize through the theory of Marxism. With the application of this theoretical analysis, it is discovered that the world portrayed in The Handmaid’s Tale is a dystopian nightmare which subdues the proletariats. Most criticism overseas the class to which the handmaid belongs.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Atwood, M. (1986). The handmaid’s tale. New York: Fawcett Crest.
Banner, L. W. (1973). Religious benevolence as social control: A critique of an interpretation. The Journal of American History, 60(1), 23-41.
Callaway, A. A. (2008). Women disunited: Margaret Atwood’s the handmaid’s tale as a critique of feminism. San Jose State University.
Coad, D. (2001). Hymens, lips and masks: The veil in Margaret Atwood’s the handmaid’s tale. Literature and psychology. 47(1-2), 54-67.
Dopp, J. (1994). Subject-position as victim-position in the handmaid’s tale. Studies in Canadian Literature, 19(1), 43-57.
Freibert, L. M. (1988). Control and creativity: the politics of risk in Margaret Atwood’s the handmaid’s tale. Critical Essays on Margaret Atwood. In J. McCombs and G. K. Hall (Eds.), Critical Essays on World Literature (pp.280-292). Boston: G. K. Hall & Co.
Johnson, B. (1996). Language, power, and responsibility in the handmaid’s tale: Toward a discourse of literary gossip. Canadian Literature, 148(Spring), 39-55.
Jones, C. (1996). Women of the future: Alternative scenarios. The Futurist, 30(3), 34-39.
McCarthy, M. (1986, February 9). Breeders, wives and unwomen. New York Times Book Review, p.1.
Myrsiades, Linda. (1999). Law, Medicine, and the Sex Slave in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. In K. Myrsiades and L. Myrsiades (Eds.), The Handmaid’s Tale. Un-Disciplining Literature: Literature, Law, and Culture (Vol. 121, pp.219-245). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Rao, E. (1993). Strategies for identity: The fiction of Margaret Atwood. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Rubenstein, R. (1988). Nature and nurture in dystopia. Margaret Atwood: Visions and forms (pp.101-112). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Tyson, L. (2003). Critical theory today: A user-friendly guide. Routledge, New York London.
Violeta, M. (2007). The handmaid’s tale: a feminist reading. Gladys Zündel Gymnase Auguste Piccard.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10328
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 roohoollah roozbeh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard
Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or sll@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org
Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture