Analysis of Fracture Initiation Pressure of Horizontal Well at Anisotropic Formation Using Boundary Element Method

Guanyu ZHONG, Ruihe WANG, Weidong ZHOU, Chunhao WAN, Guichun CHEN

Abstract


With the influence of bedding plane, the mechanical properties of bedded rocks, such as shale and coal rock at vertical and parallel bedding direction show comparatively significant difference. Therefore, compared with homogeneous rocks, bedded rocks exhibit obvious anisotropic mechanical properties. Currently, most fracture initiation pressure prediction models simplify rock to homogeneous dielectric elastomer, which is inapplicable to calculate wellbore fracture initiation pressure at bedded stratums. Given that the mechanical properties of bedded rocks at bedding plane direction are the same, this paper established a calculation model of horizontal well fracture initiation pressure in the anisotropic formation and set up a numerical solution method of circumferential stress around the borehole by means of using boundary element method. In addition, a calculation method for fracture initiation pressure based on tensile strength criterion and simplex algorithm was also proposed. The research results indicate that: In the case of high elasticity modulus anisotropy ratio, the wellbore fracture initiation pressure is low; when the elasticity modulus at vertical bedding direction is greater than that at parallel bedding direction, fracture initiation pressure decreases with the increase of bedding dip angle; the shape of wellbore has imposed an significant influence on fracture initiation pressure. For non-circular wellbore, fracture initiation pressure increases with the increase of length-width ratio in the case of smaller ovality. When wellbore shape transforms from equiaxial circle to long and narrow ellipse, fracture initiation pressure decreases with the increase of stress concentration level. Thus, this paper performed calculation and comparison with classical solutions for particular cases similar to isotropic body of stratum using the model established which verified the validity of the proposed theory. According to the research results, a new method for precise calculation of fracture initiation pressure of horizontal well at bedded stratum was provided.


Keywords


Horizontal well; Fracture initiation pressure; Anisotropy; Boundary element method

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] Dong, Z. Z., Holditch, S., McVay, D., & Ayers, W. B. (2012). Global unconventional gas resource assessment. SPE Economics & Management, 4(4), 222-234.

[2] Saldungaray, P. M., & Palisch, T. T. (2012). Hydraulic fracture optimization in unconventional reservoirs. Paper presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

[3] Zamiran, S., Osouli, A., & Ostadhassan, M. (2014). Geomechanical modeling of inclined wellbore in anisotropic shale layers of Bakken formation. Paper presented at 48th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

[4] Lekhnitskij, S. G. (1977). Theory of the elasticity of anisotropic bodies. Moscow: Mir Publishers.

[5] Aadnoy, B. S. (1988). Modeling of the stability of highly inclined wellbores in anisotropic rock formations. SPE Drilling Engineering, 3(3), 259-268.

[6] Ong, S. H., & Roegiers, J. C. (1995). Fracture initiation from inclined wellbores in anisotropic formations. Paper presented at the International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering, Beijing, China.

[7] Serajian, V. (2011). A study of hydraulic fracturing initiation in transversely isotropic rocks (Doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, USA.

[8] Hou, B., Chen, M., &Wang, Z. (2013). Hydraulic fracture initiation theory for a horizontal well in a coal seam. Petroleum Science, 10(2), 219-225.

[9] Zhu, H. Y., Guo, J. C., & Zhao, X. (2014). Hydraulic fracture initiation pressure of anisotropic shale gas reservoirs. Geomechanics & Engineering, 7(4), 403-430.

[10] Wang, H. Y., Kumar, A., & Samuel, R. (2014). Geomechanical modeling of wellbore stability in anisotropic salt formation. Paper presented at SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Maracaibo, Venezuela.

[11] Li, Y. M., Liu, G. H., & Li, J. (2015). Improving fracture initiation predictions of a horizontal wellbore in laminated anisotropy shales. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 24, 390-399.

[12] Thallak, S., Rothenburg, L., & Dusseault, M. (1991). Simulation of multiple hydraulic fractures in a discrete element system. Paper presented at the 32nd U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), Norman, Oklahoma.

[13] Bobet, A., & Yu, H. T. (2015). Stress field near the tip of a crack in a poroelastic transversely anisotropic saturated rock. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 141, 11-18.

[14] Pan, E., & Amadei, B. (1996). Fracture mechanics analysis of cracked 2-D anisotropic media with a new formulation of the boundary element method. International Journal of Fracture, 77(2), 161-174.

[15] Marques, S. P. C., & Creus, G. J. (2012). Computational Viscoelasticity (pp.87-92). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

[16] Ke, C. C., Chen, C. S., & Tu, C. H. (2008). Determination of fracture toughness of anisotropic rocks by boundary element method. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering, 41(4), 509-538.

[17] Hossain, M. M., Rahman, M. K., &Rahman, S. S. (2000). Hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation: Roles of wellbore trajectory, perforation and stress regimes. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 27(3), 129-149.

[18] Huang, J. S., Griffiths, D. V., & Wong, S. W. (2012). Initiation pressure, location and orientation of hydraulic fracture. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 49(1), 59-67.

[19] Guo, J. C., He, S. G., & Deng, Y. (2015). New stress and initiation model of hydraulic fracturing based on nonlinear constitutive equation. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 27, 666-675.

[20] Bazaraa, M. S., Sherali, H. D., & Shetty, C. M. (2013). Nonlinear programming: Theory and algorithms. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

[21] Maehara, N., & Shimoda, Y. (2013). Application of the genetic algorithm and downhill simplex methods (Nelder–Mead methods) in the search for the optimum chiller configuration. Applied Thermal Engineering, 61(2), 433-442.

[22] Aadnoy, B., Kaarstad, E., & Aadnoy, B. (2010, November). Elliptical geometry model for sand production during depletion. Paper presented at IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

[23] Zoback, M. D., Moos, D., & Mastin, L. (1985). Wellbore breakouts and in situ stress. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90(b7), 5523-5530.

[24] Sun, X. Z., & Sun, M. F. (1998). Influence of ovality on wellbore extruding and cllapsing destruction. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 22(3), 14-17.

[25] Haimson, B., & Fairhurst, C. (1967). Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rocks. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 7(3), 310-318.

[26] Kang, Y. F., Yu, M. J., & Miska, S. Z. (2009). Wellbore stability: A critical review and introduction to DEM. Paper presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

[27] Şimşek, E., & Sinha, B. K. (2008). Analysis of noncircular fluid-filled wellbores in elastic formations using a perturbation model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(1), 213-217.

[28] Wang, H. Y. (2015). Numerical modeling of non-planar hydraulic fracture propagation in brittle and ductile rocks using XFEM with cohesive zone method. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 135, 127-140.

[29] Sollero, P., & Aliabadi, M. H. (1993). Fracture mechanics analysis of anisotropic plates by the boundary element method. International Journal of Fracture, 64(4), 269-284.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/8171

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development



Share us to:   

Reminder

 We are currently accepting submissions via email only.

The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to aped@cscanada.net，or  aped@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 

We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; aped@cscanada.net; aped@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY). 

ADVANCES IN PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT Editorial Office

Address:1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net
Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:office@cscanada.net;  office@cscanada.org

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures