Application of Conventional and Constant-Rate Mercury Injection on Microscopic Pore Structure Research
Abstract
Microscopic pore structure features for cores in different formations are studied by conventional mercury method and constant-rate mercury method. With constant-rate mercury injection data, distribution curve feature of pore parameters are related with permeability, which including body radius, throat radius and aspect ratio distribution curve; the statistics parameters (skewness, standard deviation and kurtosis) for above three pore features are also analyzed and related to macroscopic parameters, including permeability and porosity. With conventional mercury injection data, major factors affecting reservoir producing in microscopic pore are screened with statistics methods, normalization Pc-curves are made by J function method including withdrawal curves, and compared on different permeability and formations; relationship between microscopic pore structures features and reservoir producing is analyzed, which need further research.
Key words: Conventional mercury injection; Constant-rate mercury injection; Producing state; Statistics method
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Wang, X. W. (2010). Study on microscopic pore structure and porous flow in Daqing peripheral reservoir with extra low permeability (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
[2] Xu, Y. (2011). Study on pore structure features in reservoir with low permeability by constant-rate mercury injection. Tuha Oil & Gas, 2011, 237-242.
[3] Zhu, Y. X. (2008). Study on microscopic structure in formation by conventional and constant-rate mercury injection. Natural Gas Geosciences, 19(4), 553-556.
[4] Chen, L. Y., & Liu, Y. K. (2013). Influence of microscopic pore structure on reservoir producing status analysis by mercury injection. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 2620-2623.
[5] Liu, X. P. (2008). Pc-curves for formation drawing and application. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science and Technology Edition), 30(6), 126-130.
[6] Liao, J. (2008). Normalization of Pc-curves and J function Processing. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 15(6), 73-75.
[7] Chen, L. Y., & Liu, Y. K. (2014). Compare the petrophysics of formation type I and II by Mercury Injection Curve Normalization. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 258-261.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/5191
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Reminder
We are currently accepting submissions via email only.
The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to aped@cscanada.net,or aped@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; aped@cscanada.net; aped@cscanada.org
Articles published in Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
ADVANCES IN PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT Editorial Office
Address:1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net
Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures