Uncertainty in Fluid Flow Measurement: A Case Study of Flow Measurement Comparison Through PVC and Steel Pipes at Varying Temperatures for Liquid With Small Air Bubbles
Abstract
Using fresh water with small amount of air bubbles of size as small as a pencil dot, the existing flow meter in the flow system (hydraulics) was proved using the Sierra Ultrasonic meter (Innova-SonicTM Model 210i) with measurement medium taken at ambient temperature of 30oC. The procedures for installation of the ultrasonic meter were followed and measurement taken with transducers mounted using V-method and N-method respectively, on a pipe size of 20mm. The V-method and N-method gave average flow rates of 0.02918cf/sec and 0.04402cf/sec respectively. The V-method resulted in a meter factor of 1.9610, while the N-method resulted in a meter factor of 3.2511. The V-method and N-method gave relative percentage error values of 49% and 69.2% respectively. The V-method proved to be suitable for the pipe size of 20mm used in the experiment, with standard deviation of 5.3339x10-4 and variance of 2.84505x10-7 compared to standard deviation of 6.8x10-3 and variance of 4.624x10-5 obtained from N-method. It is recommended that a meter factor of 1.9610 obtained from V-method be applied on the existing meter. The liquid flow rates at measurement medium temperatures of 50oC and 70oC were determined by the use of poly-vinyl chloride and steel pipes respectively. It was observed that fluid flow rate increased with increase in temperature, and flow rate determined with ultrasonic flowmeter depends on material type as flow through poly-vinyl chloride pipe was generally higher compared with steel pipe at the temperatures values considered.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baker, R. C. (1990). Fluid flow measurement. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 1(4), 241-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0955-5986(90)90020-8
Berrebi, J., Martinsson, P. E., Willatzen, M., & Delsing, J. (2018, Jun. 5). Ultrasonic flow metering errors due to pulsating flow. Denmark: Accessed from DiVA portal. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:989127/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Bruna, P., Torres, R.R., Adroaldo, D.R., & Marcia, P. (2018). Performance of ultrasonic flow meter in different Vinyl polychloride pipes. IRRIGA, 23, 87-95, https://doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2018v23n1p87-95.
Carl, C., & Jerker, D. (2000). Installation effects on an ultrasonic flow meter with implications for self diagnostics. Flow measurement and instrumentation, 11, 109-122.
Drost, C. J. (1978). Vessel diameter-independent volume flow measurements using ultrasound (17th, pp.299-302). Biomedical Symposium, San Diego.
Eric, K. (2018, Jul. 10). Flow meter installation effects. Houston, TX, USA: Accessed from American School of Gas Measurement Technology.
Greg, W. (2018, Nov. 8). Fundamentals of meter provers and proving methods. Flow measurement devices. Houston, TX, USA: Accessed from American School of Gas Measurement Technology.
Gu, X. T., & Cegla, F. (2019). The Effect of Internal Pipe Wall Roughness on the Accuracy of Clamp-On Ultrasonic Flowmeters. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 68(1), 65-72. 10.1109/TIM.2018.2834118.
Harry-James, J. H. (2018, Jun. 5). Liquid meter proving technique. Calgary, Canada: Press Release of iMEC Corporation.
Lynnworth, L., & Brown, A. (2001). Ultrasonic Flow meters. Flow Measurement (2nd ed.). Research Triangle Park: D. W. Spitzer, USA.
Lynnworth, L., & Liu, Y. (2006). Ultrasonic flowmeters: half-century progress report, 1955-2005. Elsevier Ultrasonics, 44(Supplement), e1371-e1378. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ultras. 2006.05.046
Ma, L., Liu, J., & Wang, J. (2012). Study of the accuracy of ultrasonic flowmeters for liquid. AASRI Procedia, 3, 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aasri.2012.11.004
Mahadeva, D.V., Baker, R.C., & Woodhouse, J. (2009). Further studies of the accuracy of clamp-on transit-time ultrasonic flowmeters for liquids. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 58, 1602–1609. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2009.2012954
Monterey, L. (2018, Jul. 5). Sierra instruments. Use the right flow meter for your application. CA, USA: Accessed from Sierra Instruments.
Morris, A. S. (2001). Flow measurement. Measurement and Instrumentation Principles (3th ed., pp.319-339). Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075065081-6/50017-5
Rodger, B., Dowdell, R.E., & Wendt, R. E. (1981). Flow, Its measurement and control in science and industry (Vol.1, Part 2). Flow measuring devices. Internationale Jahrestagung- Fraunhofer-Institut Fuer Treib-Und Explosivstoffe
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11003
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Uwaezuoke Nnaemeka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Share us to: 
Reminder
We are currently accepting submissions via email only.
The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to aped@cscanada.net，or aped@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; aped@cscanada.net; aped@cscanada.org
Articles published in Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
ADVANCES IN PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT Editorial Office
Address:1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net
Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures 
