The Pragmatic Motivation Behind the Generating Mechanism of New “Bei +X” Construction
Abstract
Recently, the new “bei +X” as a catch phrase has been gained much attention of researchers, such as “被代表” (being represented), “被幸福” (being happy), 被高铁 (being high speed rail) etc.. The new “bei+X” construction adopts the form of traditional “bei+X” construction, but applies the words and expressions which are not allowed in traditional “bei+X” construction in order to achieve pragmatic negation with distorted language form and a stressed “bei”. Based on this new construction, people can satirize some abnormal social phenomena and express their impotence. Previous studies of this construction mainly centered on forms and usages, and with more and more such kind of phrases appear, researchers began to study the generating mechanism of this construction. However, most previous studies of it are based on construction grammar and the study from the perspective of pragmatics mainly focuses on pragmatic effects and values while the generating mechanism is less explained. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the pragmatic motivation behind the generating mechanism of new “bei +X” in some specific principles: contexts constrain, requirement for the maxim of minimization, and face-saving. The findings will provide a complementary explanation of the generating mechanism of new “bei +X” construction and enable us to have a better understanding of this new construction.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chai, G. Y. (2010). A philosophical criticism on “bei” phenomena with Burke’s rhetorical dramatism. Foreign Language and Literature, 26(4), 56-59.
Chen, W. B. (2010). An semantic and cognitive interpretation of the new “bei+X” structure. Modern Rhetoric, (4), 80-87.
Cheng, H. J., & Song, S. S. (2009). A probe into the new “bei+ X” structure. Language Planning, (11), 64-65.
Dai, H. Y. (2002). Conceptual structures and non-autonomous syntax: Some conceptualization principles in Chinese grammar. Modern Linguistics, 4(1), 1-12.
Feng, R. (2010). Analysis of catch phrase “bei+XX” from the combination of cognitive metaphor and grammatical metaphor. Journal of Guilin Normal College, 24(2), 83-85.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Levinson, S. (1987). Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics, 23(3), 379-431.
Liu, H. N. (2010). A multi-angle probe into the new “bei+X” construction. Chinese Character Culture, (3), 49-53.
Liu, P., & Zhao, G. J. ( 2009). The “bei zu he” under “bei shi dai”. Rhetorical Study, 74-81.
Peng, Y. M., & Gan, Y. (2010). “Bei V (two-syllabled verbs)”: A new passives. Studies of the Chinese Language, (1), 57-58.
She, C. H. (2013). The generating mechanism, semantic understanding and pragmatic effects of the new “bei” construction. Modern Rhetoric, (1), 12-28.
Wang, C. L. (2009). A new usage of “bei”—take “being committed suicide for example. Language Planning, (4), 65-66.
Yan, H. (2009). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yule, G. (2012). Pragmatics. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Zeng, Z., & Yuan, W. H. (2010). An analysis of “bei”’s new combined phenomenon. Changjiang Academic, (2), 172-179
Zhang, M. H. (2010). On the catch phrase “bei+XX” construction. Journal of Guangdoneg Polytechnic Normal University, (3), 85-87.
Zheng, Q. J. (2010). The catch phrase phenonmenon of “bei+XX” and its related pragmatic motivations. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University, 18(1), 41-44.
Zhou, W. H., & Cai, Z. L. (2009). Hot issue “bei+X” structure. Modern Chinese, (10), 138-139.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Bo LI, Yali CHEN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
We are currently accepting submissions via email only.
The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to sss@cscanada.net,or sss@cscanada.org for consideration.
We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Studies in Sociology of Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures