The Formative Dimension of Environmental Aesthetics in Marxist Theory Context
Abstract
Environmental aesthetics research mainly focusses on the aesthetic appeal of human existence environment and the social effect of environmental aesthetic feeling. It is a profound re-thinking of artistic philosophy and it has gone far beyond the theoretical dimension of the artistic aesthetics, which excluded natural beauty form esthetics since Friedrich Hegel’ aesthetic theory. The “environmental aesthetics” discussed in this paper refers to natural environment aesthetics and social environment aesthetics according to the Marxist Theory. It is superior to Eco aesthetics because of the wider research fields and multidimensional research paradigms. The booming development of modern science and technology in the Era of industrial civilization are considered as a booming expansion of human essential power, which on the one hand improves our environmental conditions, while on the other hand upsets the delicate equilibrium of the ecosystem and leads to environmental degradation. Basically, the main reason is the relative independence of social ideology, such as hysteretic environmental philosophy and ecological aesthetics ideology. Based on the construction of ecological civilization, the paper try hard to clearly draw the formative dimension of environmental aesthetics from the huge system of the Marxist Theory. This essay consists of four parts. The first part is a brief comparison of environmental aesthetics studies in Chinese and Western. Then it refers to the debates and embryo of Marxist environmental aesthetics. The third part is the basis for theoretical growth of Marxist environmental aesthetics. While the last part is evolvement logic and its ultimate appeal of Marxist environmental aesthetics. With this cardinal line, we hope to provide a new clue or perspective for environmental aesthetics research.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chen, W. H. (2014). What is the environment aesthetics? Journal of Zhengzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 47(1), 101-103.
Cheng, X. Z. (2015). Development direction of ecological aesthetics in China. Seeking Truth, (1), 119-122.
Cheng, X. Z. (2015). The theoretical innovation of environmental aesthetics and the three turns of aesthetics. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition), (1), 36-43.
Liu, J. G. (1980). On Marx’s theory of beauty—Discussing with esthetician Cai Yi. Philosophical Researches, (10), 119-122.
Liu, Y. D. (2010). From “aesthetic engagement” to “engagement aesthetics”—interview with environmental esthetician Arnold Berleant. Literature and Art Forum, (1), 28-34.
Ren, P. (2008). The theory of question-oriented reflection and its contemporary significance. Social Sciences in China, (2), 141-151.
Sun, D. J. (2008). Study on Marxist environmental philosophy. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.
Zhao, J. H. (2014). The root of formal beauty: How to answer Marx’s three questions on formal beauty. Journal of Literature, History and Philosophy, (1), 5-26.
Zhou, G. W, et al. (2014). The practice direction of environmental philosophy. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Sciences), 13(3), 1-5.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Studies in Sociology of Science
Reminder
We are currently accepting submissions via email only.
The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to sss@cscanada.net,or sss@cscanada.org for consideration.
We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Studies in Sociology of Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures