Accession of Turkey to the European Union—A Question of Advantage?

Lutz Paul Sommer

Abstract


On October 25, 2005 the European Union (EU) has started negotiations with Turkey about a possible accession. Within the scope of the controversially discussed topic, there is one main question: What effect would the perceived wealth oriented advantages and disadvantages have on a possible accession of a further country with regard to EU citizens` forming of opinion? In view of the results of the existing analysis, one can assume that on one hand there is a mainly advantage-oriented approach concerning candidate countries – as is Turkey. On the other hand, the willingness to accept new members is also influenced by the duration and the advantage taken of the own EU-Membership – differentiated by country groups.
Key words: European Union; Enlargement; EU accession of Turkey; Public opinion

Keywords


European Union; Enlargement; EU accession of Turkey; Public opinion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bürgin, A. (2006). EU-Beitrittsperspektive auf der Kippe? Eine Analyse der Entwicklungen ein Jahr nach Beginn der EU-Verhandlungen mit der Türkei. Retrieved from http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/tuerkei/04257-20070907.pdf.

EUROBAROMETER 38-66 (1992-2006). EUROBAROMETER – PUBLIC OPINION IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY No. 38-66. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives /eb/eb38 /eb38

EUROBAROMETER 66-2 (2006). EUROBAROMETER – PUBLIC OPINION IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY No. 66-2 (Country Report Austria). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/ public_opinion /archives/eb/eb66/eb66_at_nat.pdf.

Falk, A. (2001). Homo Oeconomicus Versus Homo Reciprocans: Ansätze für ein Neues Wirtschaftspolitisches Leitbild? (Working Paper No. 79, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich). Retrieved from http://e-collection.library.ethz.ch/eserv/eth:25582/eth-25582-01.

Fölsz, A., & Tóka, G. (2004, April). The Dynamics of Public Opinion about the European Union in Hungary. (Conference on Public Opinion about the European Union in Central Europe, Bloomington, Indiana). Retrieved from http://polisci.indiana.edu/euconf/Folsz.pdf.

Kizilyaprak, Z.A. (2006). Der EU-Beitritt aus dem Blickwinkel der Türkei. (Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung). Retrieved from http://www.bpb.de/themen/5P5JZF,0,0,Der_EUBeitritt_aus_ dem_Blickwinkel_der_T%FCrkei.html.

Klopf, D. W., & Park, M. (1982). Cross cultural communication: An introduction to the fundamentals. Seoul: Han Shin Publishing Company.

NN. (2001). Die öffentliche Meinung – Stolperstein für die Erweiterung? (Aktuelle Themen Nr. 3 / 2001, Deutsche Bank Research, Frankfurt). Retrieved from http://www.dbresearch.de/PROD/ DBR_ INTERNET_DE-PROD/PROD0000000000030532.

NN. (2006a). EU-Beitritt – Türkei schluckt Strukturhilfen. Retrieved from http://www.focus.de.

NN. (2006b). Attitudes towards European Union Enlargement. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/ public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_255_en.pdf.

NN. (2006c). Politbarometer Dezember 2006. Retrieved from http://www.forschungsgruppe.de.

NN. (2006d). Europas größte Verbraucherstudie 2006: Bevölkerung klar gegen einen EU-Beitritt der Türkei. (Studie „Reader’s Digest European Trusted Brands 2006). Retrieved from http://europenews.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=304.

NN. (2006e). Für ein Europa der Bürger: Prioritäten für eine bessere Zukunft („Manifest von Rom“). Retrieved from http://arc.eppgroup.eu/press/peve06/eve003/manifesto-de.pdf.

NN. (2006f). Reform-Studie: Türkei überrundet Polen: Die Türkei hat bei Reformanstrengungen im Hinblick auf einen möglichen EU-Beitritt das Unions-Mitglied Polen bequem hinter sich gelassen. Retrieved from http://www.focus.de/politik/ausland/reform-studie_aid_120990.html.

REGIERUNGonline (2005). Vertrag über die Europäische Union (Maastricht Vertrag). Retrieved from http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Lexikon/EUGlossar/V/2005-11-22-vertrag-ueber-die-europaeische-union-maastricht-vertrag-.html

Simon, H. (1990). A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism, Science 250 (4988), 1665-1668. doi:10.1126/science.2270480.

Zaunbauer, W. (2005). Die Öffentliche Meinung zum EU-Beitritt der Türkei. (Österreichisches Institut für Europäische Sicherheitspolitik). Retrieved from http://www.galerie-hunold.com/contenido-4.6.15/cms/upload/arbeitspapiere/zaunbauer.pdf.

Zöfel, P. (2003). Statistik für Psychologen im Klartext. München: Addison Wesley.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Share us to:   

Reminder

We are currently accepting submissions via email only.

The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to ibm@cscanada.net，or  ibm@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.



 Articles published in International Business and Management are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT Editorial office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail: caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures