Application of Formative Assessment in College English Teaching
Abstract
A comprehensive, objective, scientific and accurate evaluation system is a key component in College English teaching. On the one hand, it helps the students to obtain feedback to adjust their learning strategies in order to improve their learning efficiency. On the other hand, it provides the teacher with information to better achieve the teaching goal and ensure the teaching quality. The formative assessment is in nature a procedural evaluation that aims to cover the whole growth and progress of a student in learning a specific course, to provide an accurate judgment on whether and to what extent the students have achieved their learning objectives from various aspects. It facilitates the effective monitoring of students’ autonomous learning, and is particularly important in the college English teaching. This article makes an analysis on the characteristics of formative assessment, points out the principles in implementing formative evaluation and discusses the specific approaches to applying formative assessment in the college English
teaching.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ainsworth, L., & Viegut, D. (2006). Common formative assessments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Bachman. L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bloom, B. S. (1988). Learning for mastery. Los Angeles, USA: University of California press.
Bloom, B. S., Hasting, T., & Madaus, G. (1991). Handbook of formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
Cohen, A. (1994). Assessing language ability in the classroom. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Fennell, P., & Maccoll, P.(1983)Assessment & Evaluation. Canberra: The Curriculum Development Centre; New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
Gao, L. S.(2002), English language testing and assessment. Beijing, China: People’s Education Press.
Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, E., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp.591-645). Mahaway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (2001). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. China: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Neil, J. A. (2001). Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York, NY: Newbury House Publishers.
Ryan, G. W., Bernard, H. R.(2000). Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication Inc.
Stroup, W. M., Ares, N., & Hurford, A. C. (2004). A taxonomy of generative activity design supported by next generation classroom networks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wang, T. H. (2007). What strategies are effective for formative assessment in an e-learning environment? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 171–186.
Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. London: Prentice Hall.
Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/6313
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Please send your manuscripts to hess@cscanada.net,or hess@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
HIGHER EDUCATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures