The Effects of Lexical Approach on non-English Majors’ Writing Proficiency: An Empirical Study

Jianwei WANG

Abstract


conducting an experiment of applying lexical approach for one semester in college English reading and writing course, this study aims to explore the effects of lexical approach on non-English major’s writing proficiency. There were 80 subjects involved in the experiment, and half of them were in controlled group (CG), the rest in experimental group (EG). Lexical approach was used in EG and traditional approach was applied in CG. All subjects attended both pre- and post-tests. The comparisons of composition scores of both tests were made between and within groups through independent and paired t tests. The findings are: 1) Students in EG have shown greater improvement than those students in CG in writing proficiency. They get higher composition scores on average than those in CG. 2) Students in EG have achieved significant progress in writing proficiency after the application of the lexical approach. 3) Students in CG show no significant progress in writing proficiency under the instruction of traditional teaching approach. So it can be concluded that the lexical approach has positive effects on non-English majors’ writing proficiency.

Keywords


Lexical approach; Experiment; Writing proficiency; English teaching

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ding, Y., & Qi, Y. (2005). Use of formulaic as a predictor of L2 oral and written performance. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 3, 49-53.

Ellis, R. (1999). The study of second language acquisition. Shanghai, China: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Feng, X. (2008). The background of lexical approach. Journal of Chongqing Three Gorges University, 2, 45-47.

Han, X. (2011). The influence of lexical modifications on college students’ English acquisition. Foreign Language Research, 3, 96-99.

Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach. Hove, England: Language Teaching Publications.

Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory in practice. Hove, England: Language Teaching Publications.

Li, H. (2005). The lexical approach and English learners’ linguistic competence. Foreign Language World, 2, 62-68.

Nattinger, J., & DeCarrico, J. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Qi, Y. (2005). Prefabricated chunk and college English writing. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 5, 64-66.

Widdowson, H. G. (1989). Knowledge of language and ability for use. Applied Linguistic, 10, 128-137.

Wiktorsson, M. (2003). Learning idiomaticity: A corpus-based study of idiomatic expressions in learners’ written production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lunds University, Sweden.

Xu, J., & Huang, Y. (2010). The application of lexical chunks in the compositions of normal school students. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 1, 54-60.

Yamashita, J. & Jiang N. (2010). L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 647–668.

Yu, X. (2008). The empirical study on the lexical approach and English competence. Foreign Language World, 3, 54-61.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/12335

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jianwei Wang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


 

Please send your manuscripts to hess@cscanada.net,or  hess@cscanada.org  for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.


 


 Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

HIGHER EDUCATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mailcaooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures