A Corpus-Based Study of Modal Verbs Use in English Writing by EFL Learners

QIAN LI

Abstract


Based on the comparison between Chinese University Students Writing Corpus and LOCNESS, this study attempts to explore the use of modal verbs in English writing by Chinese EFL learners. The results show that EFL learners preferred to use modal verbs of high value which indicates a high degree of impoliteness. In addition, as compared with native speakers’ use, learners overused all types of modal verbs. They used less modal verbs of low value which are with a variety of semantic connotations and appropriate politeness degree. This study reveals that generally, EFL learners are lack of the pragmatic knowledge of modal verbs, and it is hard for them to distinguish the differences between different modal verbs. A series of modal verbs instruction suggestions are proposed as well.

Keywords


Modal verbs; Corpus-based study; Pragmatic value

Full Text:

PDF

References


Clinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Collins, P., Borlongan, A. M., & Yao, X. Y. (2014). Modality in philippine English: A diachronic study. Journal of English Linguistics, 42(1), 68-88.

Granger, S. (1998). The computerized learner corpus: A versatile new source of date for SLA research. In S. Granger (Ed.). Learner English on computer. New York: Eddison Wesley Longman Ltd.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jiang, T. (2006). On modal hedges in EAP—A study based on corpus. Computer Assisted Foreign Language Education, 110, 47-57.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.

Marria, J. S., Pilar, A., & Duran, R. (2007). The study of modal verbs from a pedagogical perspective: An analysis of textbooks and grammars. Revista de Linguistica y Lenguas Aplicadas, 2(1), 29-37.

McCawley, J. D. (1979). The category status of English modals. In Adverbs, vowels and other objects of wonder. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Millar, N. (2009). Modal verbs in time: Frequency changes 1926-2006. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 191-220.

Palmer, F. R. (1990). Modality and the English modals. London and New York: Longman.

Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91-112.

Wang, Q. J. (2005). Corpus of Chinese English learners’ use of modal verbs. Journal of Harbin College, 26, 132-134.

Zhou, P. L. (2006). Pragmatic analysis and its instruction on English auxiliary words. Journal of Changsha University, 20, 58-62.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/9975

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Canadian Social Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture