An Information Analysis of Judges’ Repetitive Discourse in Criminal Courtroom

Jinshi CHEN

Abstract


This paper, based on Discourse Information Theory (DIT), analyzes the information features and functions of a judge’s repetitive discourse, and the realization of judicial justice in the judge’s repetitive discourse. The results show that in the interaction between the judge and the illiterate appellant, the judge’s repetitive discourse has been put at lower information levels, endowed with specific information knots and sharing categories, falls the functions of information check, information confirmation, information request, information indication and information instruction, and maintains procedural justice, distributive justice and retributive justice. Therefore, appropriate repetitive discourse will contribute to the present reform of judges’ discourse in criminal courtroom.

Keywords


Information analysis; Judges’ discourse; Repetitive discourse; Criminal trials

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bian, J., & Li, J. (2004). Perfection of criminal trial structure: A perspective of criminal courtroom settings in China. Jurisprudence Studies, (3), 82-93.

Bian, J. (2007). An analysis of “prosecution” in criminal proceedings. People’s Procuratorial Semimonthly, (8), 36-40.

Brody, J. (1986). Repetition as a rhetorical and conversational device in Tojolabal (Mayan). International Journal of American Linguistics, 52(3), 255-274.

Chen, G. (2004). The basic conception of the reamendment of criminal procedure law: The amendments of several basic principles. Tribune of Political Science and Law (Journal of China University of Political Science and Law), 22(3), 3-9.

Chen, J. (2011). The construction of prosecution-defense-judge relationship: A frame analysis of judges” courtroom discourse processing. Beijing: Science Press.

Chen, J. (2012). The presumption of guilt in judges discourse: A study from an information structure perspective. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, (2), 104-111.

Du, J. (2007). A study of the tree information structure of legal discourse. Modern Foreign Languages, (1), 40-50, 109.

Du, J. (2009a). Information flow in discourse. Journal of Foreign Languages, 32(3), 36-43.

Du, J. (2009b). A study of the functions of courtroom questioning and answering and participants communicative objective attainment. Modern Foreign Languages, (4), 360-368, 436.

Du, J. (2010). Realization of persuasive reasoning in courtroom discourse: From the perspective of transaction-oriented information processing. Modern Foreign Languages, (4), 363-370, 436.

Dumitrescu, D. (1996). Rhetorical vs. nonrhetorical allo-repetition: The case of Romanian interrogatives. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(3), 321-354.

Fujimura-Wilson, K. (2007). Japanese exact repetitions involving talk among friends. Discourse Studies, 9(3), 319-339. doi: 10.1177/1461445607076202

Fung, L. (2007). The communicative role of self-repetition in a specialised corpus of business discourse. Language Awareness, 16(3), 224-238. DOI: 10.2167/la459.0

Ge, Y. (2014). Resolution of conflict of interest in chinese civil court hearings: A perspective of discourse information theory. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 21(1), 163-168. doi: 10.1558/ijsll.v21i1.163

Gu, Y. (2014). My view on tribunal judicial centralism. Legal Information, (6), 53-57.

Heffer, C. (2010). Narrative in the trial: Constructing crime stories in court. In M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (Eds.), The routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp.199-217). Abingdon: Routledge.

Jiang, T., & Jiang, G. (2016). Reform of procuratorial system in the perspective of tribunal judicial centralism. Hebei Law Science, 34(1), 23-40. doi: 10.16494 /j.cnki.1002-3933.2016.01.003

Johnstone, B. (1994). Repetition in discourse: A dialogue. In B. Johnstone (Ed.), Repetition in discourse interdisciplinary perspectives (Vol. 1, pp.1-20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Li, L., & Zhao, H. (2009). Criminal courtroom discourse and human rights guarantee of the accused. Hebei Law Science, 27(10), 56-62.

Liao, M. (2003). A study of courtroom question-response interaction. Beijing: Law Press.

Lü, W. (2006). The power domination of judges” discourse. Foreign Languages Research, (2), 9-13. doi: 10.13978/j.cnki.wyyj.2006.02.002

Matoesian, G. M. (2001). Law and the language of identity. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sanders, J. & Hamilton, V. L. (2000). Justice and legal institution. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp.3-27). New York: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers.

Svennevig, J. (2004). Other-repetition as display of hearing, understanding and emotional stance. Discourse Studies, (6), 489-516. doi: 10.1177/1461445604046591

Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tyler, A. (1994). The role of repetition in perceptions of discourse coherence. Journal of Pragmatics, (21), 671-688.

Xu, Y. (2014). Realisation of persuasion in Chinese court conciliation: A discourse information perspective. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 21(1), 157-162. doi: 10.1558/ijsll.v21i1.157

Yu, L. (2015). Caught in dilemmas: A linguistic analysis of the role played by the interpreter in Chinese criminal sessions. Journal of Zhejiang International Studies University, (2), 1-9.

Zhang, Y. (2004). The repetition phenomena in the dialogue. Language and Translation, (3), 19-22.

Zhou, Q. (2012). Judges” power and discourse in criminal court: Reflection of judges” power in criminal court. Legal System and Society, (8), 123-125.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/9482

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jinshi Chen

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture