Is the Research of CPC Regulations a Discipline or Not
Abstract
The research of the CPC regulations is an important component of the philosophical and social sciences with Chinese characteristics. In theory, since it satisfies the internal elements of the research object and scientific methods as the criteria on classification of disciplines, the research of the CPC Regulations may become an independent discipline. And since the institutional construction of the CPC regulations has boasted a long-term significant social and historical practices with far-reaching influence and unique features in urgent need of academically theoretical guidance, the research on the CPC regulations also satisfies the criteria of social and historical practices as the criteria on classification of disciplines, and thus it should and will certainly become an independent discipline. For establishing the discipline of the CPC regulations, there is no need to follow the strict criteria for its organizational construction or wait for its complete maturity. With certain research foundations and results, we may well undertake researches on the CPC regulations as a discipline and related construction of courses and teaching materials, hence further enriching the content of the philosophical and social sciences with Chinese characteristics.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Fu, Z. T. (2015). Party regulations within the rule of law system. Journal of Party School of Central Committee of the CPC, (3), 17-23.
Gao, X. H. (1987). Criteria on classification of scientific disciplines. Research of Social Sciences, (4), 45-51.
Li, Z. (2015). Study on CPC regulations. Beijing: China Social Sciences Publishing House.
Qin, Q. H., & Su, S. L. (2016). Benchmarks on and paths to connect and coordinate party regulations and state laws. Science of Law, (5), 21-30.
Song, G. D. (2015). Governance by party regulations. Beijing: Law Press China.
Timothy, F., & Garen, M. (2006). An empirical assessment of the rise and fall of accounting as an academic discipline. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=975120.2017-02-07
Wang, Q. S. (2015, October 23). Sticking to high standard of morality and bottom line of law, and advancing institutional innovations in comprehensively strict party governance. Renmin Daily, p.A4.
Wang, Z. M., et al. (2016). Study on CPC regulations (pp.4-5). Beijing: Renmin Press.
Yu, J. S., & Wu, Z. P. (Ed.). (2009). International economical law. Beijing: Law Press China.
Yu, G. R. (2016). Tradition of ritual law and good governance by good law. Journal of Jinan University, (4), 53-56.
Zhang, B. X. (2014). The criteria for establishment of ethnography and its scientific connotation. Shaanxi Education (Higher Education), (6), 28-29.
Zhou, Y. Z. (2016). Legal techniques and attributes of the new party disciplinary regulation. Journal of Wuhan University, (1), 6-9.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/9291
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Lu ZHANG, Jin LIU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science
We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net,or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture