An Appraisal of the Freedom of Information Act (FoIA) in Nigeria

Oberiri Destiny Apuke

Abstract


This study appraises the Freedom of Information Act in Nigeria. The study made use of qualitative research method. The researcher consulted secondary sources such as books, journals, and magazines for the collection of data. The study reveals that in Nigeria, Freedom of Information Act contains more exemption sections and clauses than sections that grant access to information. This means that some mischievous public officers can use these sections for unjust and mischievous purposes. Another fundamental issue that affects The Freedom of Information Act is some other media laws that are still fully operational in Nigeria. For example, we have the Official Secrets Act, Evidence Act, the Public Complaints Commission Act, the Statistics Act, and the Criminal Code; all aimed at suppressing the free flow of information. The study recommends that the workability of the law in Nigeria remains a concern. Allaying this concern will be highly predicated on how well strict compliance is made to the relevant provisions of the law. Some of the anti-press laws that adorn or law book should either be expunged or repelled. It is in that, that the FoIA can be beneficial to the Nigerian nation and its citizens alike.


Keywords


Freedom of information act; Access to information; Appraisal; Media laws; Nigeria

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anaeto, S. G., Onabanjo, O. S., & Osifeso, J. B. (2008). Models and theories of communication. Maryland: African Renaissance Books Incorporated.

Marzolf, T. (1991). Civilizing voices: American press criticism, 1880-1950. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing Group.

Media Rights Agenda. (2011). Freedom of Information Act, 2011. An Explanatory Memorandum. Retrieved from http://ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/87604/99958/

Ogbuokiri, K. (2001). Nigeria: The limit of information act in freedom of information Act 2011 and the fight against corruption and corporate fraud in governance. Retrieved 2016, October 13 from http://www.allafrica.com

Robert, A. (2000). Freedom of information act: Parliamentary of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 2016, October 13 from http://www.ukfreedom.com

Siebert, F. S., Peterson, T., & Schramm, W. (1956). Four theories of the press. Chicago: The University of Illinois Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/9077

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Oberiri Destiny Apuke

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net,or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture