Junior Middle School Students’ Perceptions of Mathematics Classroom Learning Environments and Their Approaches to Learning Mathematics in China

Meng GUO

Abstract


This study investigated Chinese junior middle school students’ perceptions of mathematics classroom learning environments and approaches to learning mathematics, among 1,640 students from 62 junior middle school classrooms in eight provinces in China. A Chinese-language version of the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES) and Approach to Learning Mathematics (ALM) were used in this study and were proved reliable and valid in the Chinese context. Factor analysis, CFA, descriptive statistics, Independent-Samples T Test, and Bivariate Correlation were used to analyze data from the questionnaire survey. The results of this study indicate that Chinese students failed to perceive their classroom learning environment as relatively positive, and tended to use deep learning approach and surface motive in mathematics learning. In addition, significant urban-rural differences were identified in both perceptions of classroom learning environment, and approaches to learning. The findings reveal that deep approaches were positively associated with Chinese students’ perceptions of mathematics classroom learning environments (Personal Relevance, Uncertainty, Shared Control, and Student Negotiation).


Keywords


Mathematics classroom learning environments; Approaches to learning mathematics; Junior middle school; Chinese students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). A cross-cultural study of classroom learning environments in Australia and Taiwan. Learning Environments Research, 3, 101-134.

Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Biggs, J. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 8, 7-25.

Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students’ learning processes really measure? A theoretical view and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3-19.

Biggs, J. B. (1998). Learning from Confucian heritage: So size doesn’t matter? International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 723-738.

Cai, J., & Nie, B. (2007). Problem solving in Chinese mathematics education: Research and practice. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 30, 459-473.

Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 109-138.

Dart, B., Burnett, P., Boulton-Lewis, G., Campbell, J., Smith, D., & Mccrindle, A. (1999). Classroom learning environments and students’ approaches to learning. Learning Environments Research, 2(2), 137-156.

Ding, R., Zhang, S., & Yunpeng, M. A. (2013). The constructivist classroom leaning environment Studies-effective tools for evaluation and classroom teaching improvement. Studies in Foreign Education, 40(8), 94-102.

Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. Review of Research in Education, 5(1), 163-198.

Fan, C., & Dong, Q. (2005). The actuality, value and trend of research on classroom environment. Comparative Education Review, (8), 61-66.

Fraser, B. (1989). Twenty years of classroom climate work: progress and prospect. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21, 307-327.

Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 7-34.

Fraser, B. J. (2001). Twenty thousand hours: Editor’ introduction. Learning Environments Research, 4(1), 1-5.

Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp.1191-1239). New York: Springer for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), N/A.

Fraser, B. J., Anderson, G. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1982). Assessment of learning environments: Manual for Learning Environment Inventory (LEI) and My Class Inventory (MCI) (third version). Perth, Australia: Western Australian Institute of Technology.

Gao, L. (1996). Cultural context of school science: Teaching and learning in P. R. China. Paper given to The Global Summit on Science and Science Education, San Francisco, December 27-29.

Huang, A. L., & Xue-Yuan, D. U. (2007). Comparative analysis of urban-rural difference of family education in China. Journal of Yibin University, 1, 107-110.

Huang, T., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (1998). A cross-national study of perceived classroom environments in Taiwan and Western Australia: Combing quantitative and qualitative approaches (in Chinese). Science Education, 6, 343-362.

Lee, M. H., Johanson, R. E., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). Exploring Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92(2), 191-220.

Lee, W. O. (1996). The cultural context for Chinese learners: Conceptions of learning in the Confucian tradition. In D. A. Watkins, & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural psychological and contextual influences (pp.25-41). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Ma, Y. P., Lam, C. C., & Wong, N. Y. (2006). Chinese primary school mathematics teachers working in a centralised curriculum system: A case study of two primary schools in North-East China. Compare: A Journal of Comparative Education, 36, 197-212.

Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp.36-55). Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Academic Press.

Ministry of Education. (2003). The new scheme (for experiment) of senior high school’s curriculum. Beijing: People’s Education Press.

Moos, R. H. (1974). The social climate scales: An overview. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). Timss 2011 international results in mathematics. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, 516.

Murphy, D. (1987). Offshore education: A Hong Kong perspective. Australian Universities Review, 30(2), 43-44.

Nix, R. K., Fraser, B. J., & Ledbetter, C. E. (2005). Evaluating an integrated science learning environment using the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey. Learning Environments Research, 8, 109-133.

OECD. (2010). Shanghai and Hong Kong: Two distinct examples of education reform in China. Retrieved 2013, March 12 from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/34/45/46581016.pdf

Peiro, M. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2009). Assessment and investigation of science learning environments in the early childhood grades. In M. Ortiz & C. Rubio (Eds.), Educational evaluation: 21st century issues and challenges (pp.349-365). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Qian, X., & Wang, X. (2014). A study on the basic features of the senior high school curriculum reform in the UK. Studies in Foreign Education, 41(2), 45-53.

Ramsden, P., Martin, E., & Bowden, J. (1989). School environment and sixth form pupils approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59(2), 129-142.

Smith, D. C. (1997). Middle education in the Middle Kingdom: The Chinese junior high school in modern Taiwan. London: Praeger.

Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293-302.

Tong, K. M. (1970). Educational ideas of Confucius. Hong Kong: Youth Books.

Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. (1973). Social environment of junior high and high school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 93-102.

Tsai, C.-C. (2007). Teachers’ scientific epistemological views: The coherence with instruction and students’ views. Science Education, 91, 222-243.

Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414-419.

Weller, J. M., Henning, M., Civil, N., Lavery, L., Boyd, M. J., & Jolly, B. (2013). Approaches to learning for the anzca final examination and validation of the revised study process questionnaire in specialist medical training. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, 41(41), 631-40.

Wong, N. Y., &Watkins, D. A. (1998). A longitudinal study of the psychosocial environment and learning approaches in the Hong Kong classroom. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(4), 247-254.

Yang, X. (2015). Rural junior secondary school students’ perceptions of classroom learning environments and their attitude and achievement in mathematics in West China. Learning Environments Research, 18, 249-266.

Yao, R. R. (2011). The difficulties and countermeasures of the transformation of students’ learning styles in mathematics classroom teaching of secondary schools. Curriculum Teaching Material & Method, 32(11), 41-44.

Yuen-Yee, G. C., & Watkins, D. (1994). Classroom environment and approaches to learning: An investigation of the actual and preferred perceptions of Hong Kong secondary school students. Instructional Science, 22, 233-246.

Zheng, Y. (2006). Mathematics education in China: From a cultural perspective. In F. K. S. Leung, K.-D. Graf, & F. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions—A comparative study of East Asia and the West (pp.382-390). New York: Springer.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Meng Guo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture