Calculation and Classification as Dimensions of Social Interaction

Paolo Totaro

Abstract


Cassirer interpreted the transition from medieval to modern theoretical thinking as an epistemological revolution which saw the concept of function to replace that of substance as a guide to knowledge. This article suggests that, in the practical world, classification into classes, types or genres is correlated to the concept of substance, while the concept of function is present in any practical calculation in the form of algorithmic procedures. The way in which algorithmic calculation and classification interact with each other has resulted in the preservation, expansion or loss of social interaction, understood as reciprocity between actors. The action of calculation and classification can then be used as epistemological coordinates to analyze social interaction. Such systematization results in a set of schemes presented in this paper along with ethnological studies supporting the theoretical model.

Keywords


Algorithms; Classification; Social integration; System integration; Formal rationality

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arrighi, G. (1989). Custom and innovation: Long waves and stages of capitalist development. In M. di Matteo, R. M. Goodwin & A. Vercelli (Eds.), Technological and social factors in long term fluctuations: Proceedings of an international workshop held in Siena, Italy, December 16–18, 1986 (pp.89-113). New York: Springer.

Baudrillard, J. (1970/1998). The consumer society: Myths and structures. London: Sage.

Blau, P. M. (1956). Bureaucracy in modern society. New York: Random House.

Blau, P. M., & Scott, R. W. (1962). Formal organization: A comparative approach. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.

Bourdieu, P. (1979/1984). Distinctions: A social critique of the judgment of taste. In R. Nice (Ed.). Harvard University Press.

Bughin, J., Doogan, J., & Vetvik, O. J. (2010). A new way to measure word-of-mouth marketing. Insight & Publications, McKinsey & Company. Retrieved 2015, June 20 from http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/marketing_sales/a_new_way_to_measure_word-of-mouth_marketing

Cassirer, E. (1922). Das erkenntnisproblem in der philosophie und wissenschaft der neueren zeit. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.

Cassirer, E. (1923/1953). Substance and function and einstein’s theory of relativity. In W. C. Swabey & M. C. Swabey (Eds.). Chicago: Dover Publications, Inc.

Cassirer, E. (1925/1955). The philosophy of symbolic forms. In R. Manheim (Trans.), Mythical thought (Vol.2). New Haven: Yale University Press.

Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.

CEPAL. (1979). Urbanização na América Latina. In L. Pereira (Ed.), Urbanização e Subdesenvolvimento (pp.81-104). Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.

Crosby, A. W. (1997). The measure of reality: Quantification and western society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crozier, M. (1963). Le phénomène bureaucratique. Paris: Seuil.

Davis, M. (1958). Computability and unsolvability. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

EURAMET. (2008). Metrology – In short (3rd ed.). Retrieved 2015, June 4 from http://www.euramet.org/fileadmin/docs/Publications/Metrology_in_short_3rd_ed.pdf

Fernandes, F. (2008). A integração do negro na sociedade de classes. São Paulo: Globo.

Frank, A. G. (1966). Development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review, 18(4), 17-31.

Galilei, G. (1632/1980). Dialogo sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo. In Opere (Vol. II, pp.13-552). Torino: UTET.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity

Press.

Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge: Blackwell.

Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 4(35), 519-530.

Herschmann, M. (2005). O funk e o Hip-Hop invadem a cena. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ.

Johnston, R., & Lawrence, P. R. (1988). Beyond vertical integration – the rise of the value-adding partnership. Harvard Business Review, 66(Jul./Aug), 94-101.

Karp, R. M. (2011). Understanding science through the computational lens. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 26(4), 569-577. doi: 10.1007/s11390-011-1157-0

Kriedte, P., Medick, H., & Schlumbohm, J. (1981). Industrialization before Industrialization. In B. Schempp (Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lambert, R., & Peppard, J. (2000). The information technology-organizational design relationship. In R. D Galliers, D. E Leidner, & B. S. H. Baker (Eds.), Challenges and strategies in managing information systems (pp.454-486). Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

Lanier, J. (2010). You are not a gadget. New York: A. Knopf.

Lash, S. (1994). Reflexivity and its doubles: Structure, aesthetics, community. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (pp.110-173), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity press.

Lash, S. (2007). Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation? Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 55-78.

Le Goff, J. (1977). Pour un outre moyen age. Paris: Gallimard.

Lopes, J. R. (2006). Industrialização e mudanças culturais no Vale do Paraíba, SP. In E.M. Q. Chamon & C. M. Sousa (Eds.), Estudos Interdisciplinares em Ciências Sociais (pp.193-218). Taubaté, SP: Cabral.

Mach, E. (1883/1919). The science of mechanics: A critical and historical account of its development. In T. J. McCormack (Trans.). Chicago-London: The Open Court Publishing Co.

Mantoux, P. (1928/2006). The industrial revolution in the eighteenth century: An outline of the beginnings of the modern factory system in England. London: Routledge.

Martine, G., & Garcia, R. C. (1987). Êxodo rural, concentração urbana e fronteira agrícola. In G. Martine & R. C. Garcia (Eds.), Os impactos sociais da modernização agrícola (pp.59-79). São Paulo: Caetés.

Martine, G., & Beskow, P. R. (1987). O modelo, os instrumentos e as transformações na estrutura de produção agrícola. In G. Martine & R. C. Garcia (Eds.), Os impactos sociais da modernização agrícola. (p.1939). São Paulo: Caetés.

Marx, K. (1952). Capital. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica.

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. (1987/1998). The three of knowledge: The biological root of human understanding. In R. Paolucci (Trans.). Boston: Shambhala.

Mayo, E. (1945). The social problems of an industrial civilization. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.

Meira, S. (2010). Estratégia: Seu negocio e as [ou nas] redes sociais. Retrieved 2015, June 7 from http://boletim.de/silvio/sem-categoria/estratgia-seu-negcio-e-as-ou-nas-redes-sociais-6/).

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Mendelson, E. (1964). Introduction to mathematical logic. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand.

Minsky, M. L. (1967). Computation: Finite and infinite machines. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Odifreddi, P. (1992). Classical recursion theory. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Owyang, J. (2010). Matrix: Evolution of social media integration and corporate websites. Retrieved 2015, June 7 from http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2010/03/28/matrix-evolution-of-integration-of-social-media-and-corporate-websites/

Paugam, S. (2013). Les formes élémentaires de la pauvreté. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Peiters, R. (2013). Bidirectional dynamics of materialism and loneliness: Not just a vicious cycle. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 615-631. doi: 10.1086/671564

Pollard, S. (1963). Factory discipline in the industrial revolution. The Economic History Review, 16(2), 254-271.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.

Qualman, E. (2009). Socialnomics. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley Trade.

Rifkin, J. (2009). The empathic civilization. New York: J. P. Tarcher/Penguin.

Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Santos, M. (1993). A urbanizacão brasileira. São Paulo: Hucitec.

Schutz, A. (1973). The problem of social reality. The Hague: Nijhoff.

Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25-35.

Simmel, G. (2004). The philosophy of money. In T. Bottomore & D. Frisby (Trans.). London: Routledge.

Souza, J. (2003). A construção social da subcidadania: Para uma sociologia política da modernidade periférica. Belo Horizonte: UFMG.

Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York, NY, USA and London, UK: Harper & Brothers.

Thompson, E. P. (1967). Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism. Past & Present, 38(1), 56-97.

Totaro, P., & Ninno, D. (2014). The concept of algorithm as an interpretative key of modern rationality. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(4), 29-49. doi: 10.1177/0263276413510051

Weber, M. (1922/1978). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Yúdice, G. (2004). The expediency of culture: Uses of culture in the global era. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Canadian Social Science



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture