The Politics of Supervising Postgraduate Students: A Viewpoint

Jamie P. Halsall

Abstract


Postgraduate research training and research supervision have come under close scrutiny at many UK university institutions. Students today who decided to take up postgraduate studies go through a demanding process. Moreover, postgraduate study has become more complex for universities to deliver because the postgraduate student sector has become more diverse in terms of internationalisation, part time studies and curriculum outline in courses. This paper seeks to critically explore the complex relationships between postgraduate students and their supervisor. It is suggested that both the student and supervisor are on a learning curve that tests each other’s ability in the higher education sector.

Keywords


Relationship; Supervision; Pedagogy; Postgraduate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bathmaker, A. M. (2003). The expansion of higher education: A consideration of control, funding and quality. In S. Bartlett & D. Burton (Eds), Education studies. Essential Issues (Chapter 8, pp.169-18). London: Sage.

Bear, C., & Wilson, J. P. (2006). Experiential learning: A best practice handbook for educators and trainers. London, Kogan Page.

Beer, M., & Mason, R. B. (2009). Using a blended approach to facilitate postgraduate supervision. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(2), 213-226.

Bevan, D., & Kipka, C. (2012). Experiential learning and management education. Journal of Management Development, 31(3), 193-197.

Biggs, J. (2002). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham, Open University Press.

Brockband, A., & McGill, I. (1998). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. Buckingham, Open University Press.

Conrad, L. (1999). Contextualising postgraduate supervision to promote quality. In G. Wisker & N. Sutcliffe (Eds), Good practice in postgraduate supervision (Chapter 2, pp.13-24). Birmingham, SEDA.

Cywinski, B. (2013) Examining a PhD: The role of the internal examiner. Huddersfield, The University of Huddersfield.

Dowling, R., Gorman-Murray, A., Power, E., & Luzia, K. (2012). Critical reflections on doctoral research in human geography: The “PhD by publication”. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(2), 293-305.

Eggins, H., & Macdonald, R. (2003). The scholarship of academic development. Maidenhead, Open University Press.

Evans, C., & Stevenson, K. (2011). The experience of international nursing students studying for a PhD in the UK: A qualitative study. BMC Nursing, 10(11), 1-13.

Fowler, J. (2008). Experiential learning and its facilitation. Nurse Education Today, 28(4), 427-433.

Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2003). Understanding Student Learning. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, & S. Marshall, (Eds), A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice (2nd ed., Chapter 2, pp.8-26). London, Routledge.

Grabbe, L. L. (2003). The trials of being a PhD external examiner. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(2), 128-133.

Green, H., & Powell, S. (2008). Doctoral education in the UK. In S. Powell & H. Green (Eds.), The doctorate worldwide (Chapter 8, pp.88-102). Maidenhead, Open University Press.

Ferguson, T. (2009). The “write” skills and more: A thesis writing group for doctorate students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 285-297.

Hill, D. (2006). New labour’s education policy. In D. Kassem, E. Mutfti, & J. Robinson (Eds), Education studies: Issues and critical perspectives (Chapter 6, pp.73-86). Maidenhead, Open University Press.

Hutchinson, T. L., & Janiszewski, G. H. (2012). Nursing student anxiety as a context for teaching/learning. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 31(1), 19-24.

Kamler, B., & Thomson, B. (2004). Driven to abstraction: Doctorate supervision and writing pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(2), 195-209.

Kandiko, C. B., & Kinchin, I. M. (2012). What is a doctorate? A concept-mapping analysis of process versus product in the supervision of lab-based PhDs. Educational Research, 54(1), 3-16.

McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63-74.

Mufti, E. (2006). New students: Same old structures. In D. Kassem, E. Mutfti, & J. Robinson (Eds), Education studies: Issues and critical perspectives (Chapter 10, pp.122-132)., Maidenhead, Open University Press.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London, Routledge.

Rowland, S. (2000). The enquiring university teacher. Buckingham, Open University Press.

Scheyvens, R., Wild, K., & Overton, J. (2003). International students pursuing postgraduate study in geography: Impediments to their learning experiences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(3), 309-323.

Scott, P. (2000). Higher education re-formed. London, Falmer Press.

Sinclair, M. (2004). The pedagogy of “Good” PhD supervision: A national cross disciplinary investigation of PhD supervision. Australian Government, Department of Education, Science and Training.

The University of Reading. (2012). Examining PhDs and other research programme theses: Good practice guide. Reading, University Graduate School.

QAA. (2011). Doctoral degree characteristics. Gloucester, The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

QAA. (2004). Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. Mansfield, Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Canadian Social Science



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture