The Third Wave of Public Administration: The New Public Governance

Runya XU, Qigui SUN, Wei SI

Abstract


Along with the development of the contemporary society, the western public sector began to set off a upsurge of “new public administration”, which changed the paradigm of the field of public administration from “the new public management” to “the new public governance”. “The new public governance” as a new paradigm of public administration, provided not only a new research framework for theory research, but also a new mode of practice for the modern government of public affairs management. This article reviewed the content and characteristics contribution and problems, as well as the reference and revelation of “the new public governance” paradigm, and it had important reference value and significance especially for deepening China’s current reform of administrative system and building the theory system of public management and public administration.


Keywords


New public governance; New public management; Public administration.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2003). Evaluating the quality of public governance: Indicators, models and methodologies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69, 313-328.

Caputo, D. (2004). La democracia en America Latina. Pograma de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Aguilar, Altea, Alfaguara.

Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The Aannlas of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78-93.

Chen, Z. M. (2000). A review of “the New public management” paradigm. Social Science in China, 6, 73-207.

Dawson, S., & Dargie, C. (1999). New public management: An assessment and evaluation with special reference to health. Public Management Review, 1(4), 459-82.

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2002). The new public service: Serving, not steering. M. E. Sharpe Press.

Dunleavy, P. (1985). Bureaucrats, budgets and the growth of the State, British. Journal of Political Science, 15, 299-

328.

Economic and Social Commission of United Nations. (2010). What is good governance. Retrieved October 23 from http://www.unescap.org/pdd/prs/ProjectActivities/Ongoing/gg/governance.asp

Frederickson, G., & Smith, K. (2003).The public administration primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Haque, S. (2000).Significance of accountability under the new approach to public governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66, 599-617.

Kickert. (1997). Public governance in the netherlands: An alternative to Anglo-American “managerialism”. Public Administration, 75(4), 731-52.

Mishra, R. (1984). The welfare state in crisis. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.

Nye, J. S., & Donahue, J. D. (2000). Governance in a globalizing world. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution

Press.

Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government. Penguin Press.

Ostrom,V., & Ostrom, E. (1971). Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, (31), 203-216.

Peters, G., & Pierre, H. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223-243.

Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 652-667.

Russell, D. (2005).The social transformation of trust in government. International Review of Sociology, 15(1), 133-54.

Skelcher, C., Mathur, N., & Smith, M. (2005). The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy. Public Administration, 83(3), 573-596.

Stephen P. O. (2006).The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-387

Stephen P. O. (2009). The new public governance. Routledge Press.

Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17-28.

The Commision on Global Governance. (1995). Our global neighborhood: The report of the commission on global governance. Oxford University Press.

Thompson, J. B. (2000). Political scandal: Power and visibility in the media age. Cambridge, UK：Polity.

Yuan, N. X. (2013). Citizen virtue, citizen rights and public administration: The paradigm plight of new public service theory. Zhejiang Social Sciences, 5, 70-157.

Zhou, Y. C. (2006).The poverty of the new public service theory. Chinese Public Administration, 12, 79-82.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture