Does “Embeddedness” Create Miracles? The Case of the “Anatolian Tigers” in Turkey

Evren Tok

Abstract


Drawing on different forms of embeddedness, this study critically examines the so-called economic miracles in the Anatolian region of Turkey, which are commonly known as the Anatolian Tigers. By decomposing the stories of the Anatolian Tigers as new loci of economic growth since 1990s, forms of embeddedness illustrate the spatio-institutional factors affecting both economic and non-economic realms with varying distillations from local institutional assets. These conditions became instrumental for both collectivizing interests of the leading local capitalists and disguising the negative consequences of the rapidly industrializing and urbanizing cities of Anatolia. Through open ended in-depth interviews conducted with leading actors in the cities of Anatolia, content analysis of the available resources published by local organizations and media, this study illustrates the role of multiple forms of embedding mechanisms that orchestrated “fragile” local economic miracles in Turkey.


Keywords


Anatolian tigers; Forms of embeddedness; Turkey; Urban transformation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acemoğlu. D., & Johnson, S.( 2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5) 1369–1401.

Acemoğlu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2008). Persistence of power, elites and institutions. American Economic Review, 98(1), 267-293.

Adas, E. B. (2003). Profit and the prophet: Culture and politics of islamic entrepreneurs in Turkey (Unpublished dissertation). Department of Sociology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Adas, E. B. (2006). The making of entrepreneurial Islam and the Islamic spirit of capitalism. Journal for Cultural Research, 10(2), 113-137.

Amin, A. (1999). An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 365-78.

Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2000). What kind of economic theory for what kind of economic geography? Antipode, 32(1), 4-9.

Aydin, Z. (2005). The political economy of Turkey. London; Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.

Bärenholdt, J. O. (2009). Regional development and noneconomic terms. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of human geography (pp.181-186). Oxford: Elsevier.

Bathelt, H., & Glückler, J. (2003). Toward a relational geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(2), 117-144.

Bayirbag, M. (2007). Local entrepreneurialism, state re-scaling and scalar strategies of representation: The case of the city of Gaziantep, Turkey (Unpublished dissertation). School of Public Policy and Administration, Carleton, University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Bazzal, F. (2004). Anadolu’nun Bes Kaplanı [The Five Tigers of Anatolia]. Capital, 12, 156-162.

Beceneli, I. (2008). Eskisehir Inovasyon Stratejisi ile Gelecegine Yön Verecek [Eskisehir will Shape its Future with Innovation]. Dünya Gazetesi, 19.

Bedirhanoğlu, P., & Yalman, G. (2009). Neoliberal küreselleşme sürecinde Türkiye’de “yerel” sermaye: Gaziantep, denizli ve eskişehir’den i̇zlenimler (Local Capital in Turkey in the Process of Neoliberal Globalisation: Reflections from Gaziantep, Denizli and Eskişehir). Praksis, 19.

Bialasiewicz, L. (2006). Geographies of production and the contexts of politics: Dislocation and new ecologies of fear in the Veneto citta diffusa. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24.

Block, F. (2003). Karl Polanyi and the writing of great transformation. Theory and Society, 32, 275–306.

Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (1998). Innovation and performance of SMEs in Italy: Relavanceof Spatial Aspects. Competition and Change, 3(2/1).

Capello, R. (1999). SME clustering and factor productivity: A milieu production function model. European Planning Studies, 7(6), p.719-732.

Clark, G. T., Palaskas, P. T., & Tsampra, M. (2004). Globalization and competitive strategy in Europe’s Vulnerable regions: Firm, Industry and country effects in labour-intensive industries. Regional Studies, 38(9).

Cook, P., & Morgan, K. (1994). Growth regions under duress: Renewal strategies in Baden- Württemberg and Emilia Romagna. In globalisation, institutions and regional development in Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Cox, K. R. (2004). Globalization and the politics of local and regional development: The question of convergence. The Institute of British Geographers, 179-194.

Cox, K. R., & Mair, A. J. (1991). From localized social structure s to localities as agents. Environment and Planning A, 23, 197-213.

Çemrek, M. (2002). Formation and representation of interests in Turkish Political Economy: The case of MÜSIAD (Independent Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Association) (Ph.D. Dissertation). Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Bilkent University, Ankara.

DeFilippis, J. (1999). Alternatives to the new urban politics: Finding autonomy and locality in local economic development. Political Geography, 18, 973-990.

Demir, O., Acar., M., & Toprak, M. (2004). Anatolian tigers or Islamic capital: Prospects and challenges. Middle Eastern Studies, 40(6), 166-188.

Demir, Ö. (2005). Anadolu sermayesi’ ya da ‘Islamci Sermaye (Anatolian Capital or Islamist Capital). In Y. Aktay (Ed.), Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düsünce (Political Thought in Modern Turkey), 3, 870-886 Islamcilik (Islamism). Istanbul: Iletisim Publishers.

Dogan, A. E. (2007). Egreti kamusallık, kayseri örneginde Islamcı Belediyecilik [Loose Public Governance, Kayseri as an example of Islamic Municipal Governance]. Istanbul: Iletisim Yayınları.

EDAM, & Deloitte. (2009). Türkiye için bir rekabet endeksi [A Competitiveness Index for Turkey]. Report on Regional Competitiveness Levels of Turkish Cities, January.

Ekonomist. (2008). Anadolu’da neler oluyor [What is Happening in Anatolia?]

Eraydın, A. (1998). Yeni sanayi odaklarının ortaya çıkmasında kamunun düzenleme ve destekleme biçimlerinin katkısı. Paper presented to Yeni Yerel Sanayi Odakları Semineri organized by State Planning Organization, State Institute of Statistics and Turkish Capital Market Board, Ankara.

Eraydın, A. (2002). The local embeddedness of firms in social networks in Turkish industrial districts: The changing roles of networks in local development. In M. Taylor (Ed.), Social Capital and the Embedded Enterprise: International perspectives, forthcoming.

Erdem, G. (2008a). Kayseri will invigorate the university-industry cooperation with Meliksah university. Dünya Gazetesi, 14.

Erdem, G. (2009). Kayseri kriz sonrasına novasyon ve Kurumsalla! ma ile Hazırlanıyor. Kayseri Prepares Itself to Post-Crises Period with Innovation, 13.

Erendil, A. (1998). Using critical realist approach in geographical research: An attempt to analyze the transforming nature of production and reproduction in Denizli (Unpublished Ph.D Thesis). City and Regional Planning Department, METU. Retrieved from Eskisehir City Portal. http://www.eskisehir.gen.tr. Last accessed September 12th, 2011.

ESO. (2008). Özenç, Mustafa.“Eskisehir Tanıtım” [Introductory document] Eskisehir: ESO Publications.

ETO. (2004). Sosyo ekonomik profil ve yerel yönetime bakıs, Eskisehir: Eskisehir Ticaret Odası Yayını.

European Stability Initiative (ESI). (2009). Islamic calvinists: Change and conservatism in central Anatolia. (19 September 2005). Available at www.esiweb.org (Accessed: 30 January 2009).

Evans, P. (Ed.) (2002). Livable cities? Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainabilit. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic institutions and social constructions: A framework of analysis. Acta Sociologica, 35, 3-12.

Hess, M. (2004). Spatial Relationships: Towards a Re-conceptualization of Embeddedness. Progress in Human Geography, 28.

Hürriyet. (2006). Müslüman protestan merkezi kayseri mi? Retrieved from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ekonomi/3843838.asp

Jessop, B. N. Brenner., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing Sociospatial Relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26.

Karatepe, S. (2003). Kendini kuran sehir [The City Which Built Itself]. Istanbul: Iz Yayıncılık. Retrieved from http://www.kayseri.gen.tr. Last accessed September 12th, 2011.

Keyman, E. F., & Koyuncu, L. B. (2005). Globalization, alternative modernities, and the political economy of Turkey. Review of International Political Economy, 12, 105-128.

Keyman, E. F., & Koyuncu, L. B. (2009a). Küresellesme, avrupalılasma ve anadolunun ekonomi politigi: Ekonomik aktörler, söylemler ve stratejiler. TÜBITAK funded project, nr. 106K351. Istanbul.

Keyman, F., & Önis, Z. (2007). Turkish politics in a changing world. Istanbul: Bilgi University Press.

Knaus, G. (2005). Islamic calvinists: Change and conservatism in Turkey. ESIWEB Report. Retyrieved from http://www.esiweb.org

Koyuncu, B. (2002). Kuresellesme ve MUSIAD (Globalization and MUSIAD). In E. F.Keyman (Ed.), Liberalizm, Devlet, Hegemonya (pp. 358-76). Istanbul: Everest.

Knaus, G. (2005). Islamic calvinists: Change and conservatism in Turkey. European Stability Initiative ESIWEB Report Berlin-Istanbul 19 September.

Koyuncu, B. (2003). Globalization and Its Impact on Turkish Business Associations: TÜSIAD and MÜSIAD in a Comparative Perspective. Bilkent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Küçüker, C. (1998). Anadolu’da hızla sanayilesen kentler: Denizli örneg., Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu: Ankara.

MacKinnon, D., & Cumbers, A. (2007). An introduction to economic geography: Globalization, uneven development and place. Prentice Hall.

MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., Pike, A., Birch, K., & McMaster, R. (2009). Evolution in economic geography: Institutions, political economy and adaptation. Economic Geography, 85(2), 129-150.

Martin, R. (2002). Institutional approaches in economic geography. In E. Sheppard & T. J. Barnes (Eds.), A Companion to Economic Geography. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Mutluer, M. (1995). Gelisimi, yapısı ve sorunlarıyla denizli sanayii. DSO Yayınları: Izmir.

Ozcan, G. B., & M, Cokgezen. (2003). Limits to alternative forms of capitalization: The case of anatolian holding companies. World Development, 31(12).

Özcan, G. B. (1995). Small firms and local economic development. Avebury: London.

Pamuk, S. (2007). Economic change in twentieth century Turkey: Is the glass more than half full? American University of Paris, Working Paper.

Pamuk, S. (1998). Denizli ve gaziantep’te sanayilesmenin yakın tarihi. Yerel Sanayi Odakları Uluslararası Semineri, 23-25 Eylül, Ankara.

Polanyi, K. (2001, 1957). Great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.

Robinson, J. A. (2005). Politician-proof policy? Desarrollo y Sociedad, 55, 1-56.

Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2000). Killing economic geography with a “cultural turn” overdose. Antipode, 33(2), 176-182.

Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131-165.

Sabah, M. (2008a, March 4)). Kayseri’nin dıs ticaret hedefi 2010’da 5 milyar dolar. Dünya Gazetesi, 18.

Sonmez, M. (1992). Turkiye’de holdingler (Holdings in Turkey). Ankara: Arkadas Yayinevi.

State Planning Organization. (2009, March 22). Economic and social indicators, 1950-2006. Retrieved from http://www.dpt.gov.tr/

Swedberg, R. (2003). Principles of economic sociology. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Tasci, C. (2010). Stratejik plan 2010 [strategic planning]. Eskisehir: Metropolitan Municipality Publications.

Tasci, C. (2008, October ). Interview with the author. Eskisehir, Turkey.

Tasci, C. (2009). Yılmaz büyükersen: Zamanı durduran saat. Istanbul: Dogan Kitap.

Taskın, T. (2009). Sarar, yurtdısında bir ayda 3 magaza açacak[Sarar is going to open 3 shops abroad in a month], Dünya Gazetesi, 16.

Taskın, T. (2009). Eskisehir gelecegine 2020 yılı profili ile yön verecek. Dünya Gazetesi, 12.

Thrift, N. (2000). Pandora’s box? Cultural geographies of economies. In G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman & M. S. Gertler (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 689-701). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

TMMOB. (2007). Konya, gaziantep, denizli and edirne girisimcilik arastirmalari. Istanbul: TMMOB Yayinlari.

Toprak, M., Demir, O., & Acar, M. (2004). Anatolian Tigers or Islamic Capital: Prospects and Challenges. Middle Eastern Studies, 40(6), 166-188.

Tunali. I., & Filiztekin, A. (2002). Anatolian tigers: Are they for real? Koc University Working Paper.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture