The Definition of Payment Service Relevant Market Under the Perspective of Antimonopoly

Yu WANG

Abstract


With the technological progress and development of payment requirements, payment services become more diversified. At present, China has basically established a multi-level payment service market, which has broken the monopolistic situation of banking payment services, gradually intensified competitions, and brought about challenges to antitrust enforcement agencies. In the face of payment service homogeneity, user lock-in effect and characteristics of bilateral market, the traditional definition of relevant market has been weakened and restricted. This article explores new paths to properly define payment service relevant market: in accordance with the business scope approved by financial supervision departments, we should reasonably define payment service market based on payment scale; meanwhile, pay attention to investigate payment service providers and rationally define the competitive market scope from a technical research and developmental perspective.


Keywords


支付服务;相关市场;反垄断

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chen, J. (2011). The role evolution from investor to financial consume. Law Studies, (5).

Chen, J. (2011). The role evolution from investor to financial consumer. Law Studies, (5).

Jiang, Y. B. (2008). A study on the anti-monopoly policies of network industry (p.43). China Social Sciences Press.

Liu, S. J. (2010, June 8). Clients are not consumers, their “protections” are essentially different. Law Weekend.

Liu, S. Y. (2013). Innovation and supervision of internet payment. China Finance, (20).

Michael, K., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition and compatibility. American Economic Review, (2), 424-440.

Rong, L. (2012). A study on third-party payment platform pricing strategy—Based on the perspective of bilateral market. Financial Innovation, (6).

Su, L. (1995). Reform, legal construction and local resources. Chinese and Foreign Law, (5).

Wang, W. G., & Wu, M. X. (2010). New expectations on the protection of consumers’ rights and interest. China Focus, (5).

Yang, T. (Ed.). (2013). China payment and settlement development report. Social Sciences Academic Press.

Ye, M. (2013). The identification difficulties and resolution of the internet industry market dominance. Law and Business Studies, (1).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net,or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture