Deal with the Item 8 of Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale(1965) and Revalidate the Factor Structure: Based on measuring groups ofmiddle school students
Abstract
Using Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (1965), we have measured 1889 students in schools. Through correlation analysis, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, we study two different ways in dealing with the item 8 of Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965), namely the score is counted according to the positive item method and deleting the item 8, explore factor models of the scale and verify the goodness of fit of different models. Our results show: (a) the item 8 should be reserved. It should adopt that the score is counted according to the positive item method. The score correlating with the total score is 0.33 (P < 0.01); (b)if the factor analysis uses two factors,the two factor correlation model has better goodness of fit (χ2/df=6.12, CFI=0.95, TLI=0.93, RMSEA=0.06), namely the two factor model can be used in the scale.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Yang, L., & Zhang, L. (2003). The psychological significance of self esteem. Psychological Exploration, 23(4), 10-12.
Huang, X., & Yang, X. (1998). Draw up young students’ self worth scale. Psychological Science, 21(4), 289-292.
Sun Qinling: 2007, Revision of self esteem scale. Master thesis. Jinan University.
Rosenberg, M., & Rosenberg, Fr. (1978). Self esteem and delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 7(3), 279-291.
Wang, X., Wang, X., & Ma, H. (1999). Mental health assessment scale manual. Chinese Mental Health Journal (Suppl), 318-320.
Wang, P., Gao, H., Xu, J. et al. (1998). A research on reliability and validity of self esteem scale. Shandong Psychiatry, 11 (4), 31-32.
Tian, L. (2006). Some disadvantages in rosenberg self esteem scale (1965). Psychological Exploration, (2), 88-91.
Wang, M., Dai, Xi., & Wu, Y. (2008). Psychometric studies of Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale of Chinese. Thesis Abstracts of National Academic Annual Meeting of the Education and Psychological Statistics and Measurement and the Eighth Cross-Strait Psychology and Educational Testing Symposium.
Han, X., Jiang, B., & Tang, J. et al. (2005). Problems and suggestions in using self-esteem scales. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science, 14(8), 763
Shen, Z., & Cai, T. (2008). Deal with the item 8 of rosenberg self esteem scale in Chinese version. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 22(9), 661-663.
Li Hong: 2004, The Measurement of Mental Health: Self Esteem Scale and Emotional Scale Comparison. Psychological Development and Education, (2), 75-79.
Yang, Y., & Wang, D. (2007). Revalidate the factor structure of Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 21(9), 603-605.
Hou, J., Wen, Z., & Cheng, Z. (2004). Structural equation models and their applications. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.
Lin, X., & Huang, Z. (2010). Further discussing the treatment of the item 8 of Rosenberg self-esteem scale in Chinese version. Chinese Journal of School Doctor, 24(4), 263-265.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science
We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net,or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture