Measuring the Locus of Causality as a Means of Generating Explanations for the Legitimization of Paltry Favors Effect

Jessica Russell, Franklin J. Boster

Abstract


Two experiments were designed to examine the potential for impression management as an explanation of the legitimization of paltry favors (LPF) effect. Scenarios varied the technique (control v. LPF, Experiment 1), and both whether or not the target complied and the amount donated by the target (Experiment 2). The potential for impression management as a mediator of the effect was explored by examining attributions made concerning the locus of causality for compliance and non-compliance. Findings provide the foundation for future research by generating evidence consistent with the desire to make a favorable impression as an explanation for the LPF effect.


Keywords


Sequential persuasion strategies; Legitimization of paltry favors; Impression management

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrews, K. R., Carpenter, C. J., Shaw, A. S., & Boster, F. J. (2008). The legitimization of paltry favors effect: A review and meta-analysis. Communication Reports, 21, 59-69. doi: 10.1080/08934210802305028

Brockner, J., Guzzi, B., Kane, J., Levine, E., & Shaplen, K. (1984). Organizational fundraising: Further evidence on the effect of legitimizing small donations. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 611-614. doi: 10.1086/208997

Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Social proof: Truths are us. In R. B. Cialdini (Ed.), Influence: Science and practice (pp.98-142). Boston: Pearson.

Cialdini, R. B., & Schroeder, D. A. (1976). Increasing compliance by legitimizing paltry contributions: When even a penny helps. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 599-604. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.34.4.599

DeJong, W., & Oopik, A. J. (1992). Effect of legitimizing small contributions and labeling potential donors as “helpers” on responses to a direct mail solicitation for charity. Psychological Reports, 71, 923-928. doi: 10.2466/PR0.71.7.923-928

Greater Lansing Food Bank. (April 15, 2011). Greater Lansing food bank: About us. Retrieved from http://www.greaterlansingfoodbank.org

Jones, E. E. & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp.219-266). New York: Academic Press.

Reeves, R. A., Macolini, R. M., & Martin, R. C. (1987). Legitimizing paltry contributions: On-the-spot vs. mail-in requests. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 731-738.

Santos, M. D., Leve, C., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1994). Hey buddy, can you spare seventeen cents? Mindful persuasion and the pique technique. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 755-764. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00610.x

Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture