Analysis of the Decision-Making Process of Judges in Setting the Sentence
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Machado Júnior, E. A. de S., & Costa, D. C. A. da. (2019). A racionalidade da Dogmática-Penal e sua função como estrutura normativa garantidora de liberdades: Uma abordagem sistêmica do Direito Penal. Sequência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos, 41(82), 221-241. https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n82p221
Roxin, C. (2008). Estudos de direito penal (L. Greco, Trad.; 2o ed). Renovar.
Moreira, H. L. F., & Pessoa, F. C. da C. (2017). As regiões de valoração ontojurídica e os mapas conceituais como recursos de ensino e aprendizagem no direito penal. Novos Estudos Jurídicos, 22(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.14210/nej.v22n1.p99-129
Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988 (1988) (testimony of Brazil). http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm
Bitencourt, C. R. (2020). Tratado de direito penal: Parte geral (26o ed, Vol. 1). Saraiva Jur.
Decreto Lei no 2.848 (1940) (testimony of Brazil). http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del2848compilado.htm
Cunha, R. S. (2019). Manual de direito penal: Parte geral (7o ed). Juspodivm.
Kahneman, D., Sibony, O., & Sunstein, C. R. (2021). Noise: A flaw in human judgment. William Collins.
Cristino, F. D. R., & Castro, J. V. D. (2007). Análise da personalidade do agente como circunstância judicial de individualização da pena no direito penal contemporâneo. Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.5902/198136946805
Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5o ed). SAGE Publications.
Pituch, K. A., & Stevens, J. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS (6o ed). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
D’Aviz, M. A. S., & Medina, J. M. G. (2022). O dever de fundamentação analítica no Processo Civil e as pontes com a teoria da argumentação jurídica. Research, Society and Development, 11(1), e4011124385. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i1.24385
Lousada, M., & Valentim, M. L. P. (2011). Modelos de tomada de decisão e sua relação com a informação orgânica. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 16(1), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362011000100009
Spiegel, T. (2014). An Overview of Cognition Roles in Decision-Making. Em J. Wang, Encyclopedia of Business Analytics and Optimization (p. 74-84). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5202-6
Wang, S., Feng, S. F., & Bornstein, A. M. (2021). Mixing memory and desire: How memory reactivation supports deliberative decision making. WIREs Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1581
Hirshleifer, D., Levi, Y., Lourie, B., & Teoh, S. H. (2019). Decision fatigue and heuristic analyst forecasts. Journal of Financial Economics, 133(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.01.005
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
Vargas, D. V., & Lauwereyns, J. (2021). Setting the space for deliberation in decision-making. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 15(5), 743-755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-021-09681-2
Dieterich, R., Endrass, T., & Kathmann, N. (2016). Uncertainty is associated with increased selective attention and sustained stimulus processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(3), 447-456. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-016-0405-8
Kahneman, D. (2013). Thinking, fast and slow (1o ed). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Levine, D. S. (2019). One or two minds? Neural network modeling of decision making by the unified self. Neural Networks, 120, 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2019.08.008
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258-290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055756
Helene, A. F., & Xavier, G. F. (2003). A construção da atenção a partir da memória. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 25(2), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462003000600004
Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79(4), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032955
Tversky, A. (1972). Choice by elimination. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 9(4), 341-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(72)90011-9
Gabrieli, G., Lim, Y. Y., & Esposito, G. (2021). Influences of social distancing and attachment styles on the strength of the halo effect. PLOS ONE, 16(8), e0256364. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256364
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(4), 250-256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250
Schwenk, C. R. (1984). Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050203
Bodington, J. (2020). Rate the raters: A note on wine judge consistency. Journal of Wine Economics, 15(4), 363-369. https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2020.30
Laroche, H., & Nioche, J.-P. (2015). L’approche cognitive de la stratégie d’entreprise. Revue Française de Gestion, 41(253), 97-120. https://doi.org/10.3166/RFG.160.81-108
Greene, T., Shmueli, G., Fell, J., Lin, C.-F., Shope, M. L., & Liu, H.-W. (2020). The hidden inconsistencies introduced by predictive algorithms in judicial decision making. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2012.00289
Bronstein, M. V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D. G., & Cannon, T. D. (2019). Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005
Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(17), 6889-6892. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018033108
Stewart, A. F., Ferriero, D. M., Josephson, S. A., Lowenstein, D. H., Messing, R. O., Oksenberg, J. R., Johnston, S. C., & Hauser, S. L. (2012). Fighting decision fatigue. Annals of Neurology, 71(1), A5-A15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23531
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/12945
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science
We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net,or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture