An Empirical Study on the Blended Teaching Mode of College English Writing Based on IWrite

Qing XU

Abstract


IWrite automatic writing evaluation system provides a new feedback method for writing teaching. By analyzing the current situation of college English writing practice and the application of iWrite, this paper explores the real effect of iWrite system in the teaching of college English writing. It aims to construct a blended teaching mode of college English writing that combines the automatic evaluation system of writing and teacher feedback, so as to substantially improve college students’ English writing ability.


Keywords


iWrite; college English writing; blended teaching mode

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bai, L. F., & Wang, J. (2019). A review on the effectiveness of automatic feedback in English writing in the past 20 years. Foreign Language Research, (1), 65-71,88.

Chen, C. J. (2013). Comparative study on automatic composition correction system. Science and Technology Horizon, (30), 144-145.

Crossley, S. (2020). Linguistic Features in Writing Quality and Development: An Overview. Journal of Writing Research, 11(3), 415-443.

Ke, Z. (2019). Automated essay scoring: Argument persuasiveness. Richardson: The University of Texas at Dallas.

Li Xiaoyuan (2020). College English mixed teaching reform and practice based on Internet plus, English Square, (17), 86-89.

Liang, M. C., & Wen, Q. F. (2007). Review and enlightenment of foreign composition automatic scoring system. Foreign Language Audio Visual Teaching, (5), 18-24.

Ramineni, C., & Williamson, D. M. (2013). Automated essay scoring: Psychometric guidelines and practices. Assessing Writing, 18(1), 25-39.

Shermis,M. D., & Brustein, J. (2003). Automated essay scoring: A cross-displinary perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Shi Xiaoling (2012). A study on the application of online writing automatic evaluation system in College English Writing Teaching -- Taking juku.com as an example. Modern Educational Technology, (10), 67-71.

Wang Jian (2015). Research on the validity of automatic composition scoring system. Hainan University.

Wang Yanfang (2015). Comparison of Chinese and American composition proposition and scoring criteria. Literature Education, (19), 73-74.

Zupanc, K., & Bosni, Z. (2017). Automated essay evaluation with semantic analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 120, 118-132.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/12727

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture