An Analysis of Prosecutorial Accountability Mechanism for Wrongful Cases

Tingbin CHANG, Guofeng LIN

Abstract


Prosecutorial accountability mechanism for wrongful cases will encourage legal handling of cases and ensure judicial justice. Despite the problems emerging in the process of prosecution, such as misapprehensions of arrests that do not result in criminal charges and of releases after a series of prosecutorial procedures, we cannot risk abolishing the mechanism that holds involving prosecutors liable for their mistakes and misconduct in wrongful cases, but endeavor to improve in ways that define wrongful cases, prosecutorial accountability and immunity from prosecutorial mistakes.


Keywords


Prosecutors; Wrongful cases; Prosecutorial accountability mechanism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chen, Y. L. (2010). On the Compatibility between the impunity system and the rule of law – Also on the establishment and improvement of the immunity system for public officials in China. Political Science and Law, (12).

Chu, G. L., & Duan, J. T. (2018). Reflections on and reconstruction of prosecutorial accountability in wrongful cases. Prosecutorial Power Execution in the Context of Deepening Practice of Rule of Law – Essay Collection of the 14th National Senior Prosecutor Forum.

Li, J. M. (2007). An analysis of prosecutorial procedure in wrongful criminal cases. China Legal Science, (3).

Li, L. C. (2016). Suggestions for prosecutorial accountability. People’s Prosecutorial Semimonthly, (20).

Li, L. C. (2016). Suggestions for prosecutorial accountability. People’s Prosecutorial Semimonthly, (20).

Liao, Y. G. (1999). A reflection on judicial accountability for wrongful cases. Jiangsu Social Sciences, (3).

Qiu, B. Y., & Liu, K. (2019). Identification of wrongful cases under the current judicial accountability system. Prosecutorial Investigation and Guidance, (4).

Shen, D. Y. (2013). Innocent until proven guilty. China Legal Science, (5).

Wang, L. (2005). Beware of system traps in prosecutorial accountability. People’s Prosecutorial Semimonthly, (12).

Wang, L. G. (2018). A Discussion of Prosecutorial Accountability for Wrongful Cases. Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College, (2).

Zhang, B. S., & Zhang, H. R. (2014). The improvement of prosecutorial services appraisal and accountability mechanism for wrongful cases. Criminal Science, (4).

Zhang, B. S., & Zhang, H. R. (2014). The improvement of prosecutorial services appraisal and accountability mechanism for wrongful cases. Criminal Science, (4).

Zhang, W. X., et al. (1996). Principles of law: A normative analysis (M. D. Bayles, 1987. Publisher: Springer). Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.

Zhu, X. Q., & Zhang, Z. H. (2010). Prosecutorial science (p.320). China Prosecutorial Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11864

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Canadian Social Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture