Efficiency Analysis of China's Water Industry: Evidence From the Cross-national Comparison and Listed Companies
Abstract
This paper estimates the efficiency of 108 water listed companies in China, U.S.A, and U.K by using the metafrontier model from 2015 to 2018. The results show that the technical efficiency of China’s urban water industry is relatively low. But the water industry efficiency gap between China and the world is narrowing.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Battese, G. E., Rao, D. S. P., & O’Donnell, C. J. (2004). A met frontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21 (1), 91-103.
Liu, Y., Sun, C., & Xu, S. (2013). Eco-effificiency assessment of water systems in China. Water Resour Manag, 27 (14), 4927-4939.
Molinos-Senante, M., & Sala-Garrido, R. (2016). Cross-national comparison of efficiency for water utilities: a met frontier approach. Clean Technologies & Environmental Policy, 18(5), 1-9.
Molinos-Senante, M., Maziotis, A., & Sala-Garrido, R. (2015). Assessing the relative efficiency of water companies in the English and welsh water industry: a metafrontier approach. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 22, 16987-16996.
O’Donnell, C. J., Rao, D. S. P., & Battese, G. E. (2008). Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiency and technology ratios. Empirical Economics, 34 (2), 231-255.
Ruan, D. F., & Han, L. H. (2016). Performance evaluation of listed water utilities companies based on DEA model. Resources & Industries, 18(4), 103-109.
Saal, D. S., Parker, D., & Jones, T. W. (2007). Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985-2000. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28, 127-139.
Tsagarakis, K. P. (2013). Does size matter? Operating cost coverage for water utilities. Water Resour Manag, 27 (5), 1551-1562.
Wang, B., & Zhu, N. (2011). Research on the efficiency and total factor productivity of China’s Listed Commercial Banks under the constraint of non-performing loans: An empirical analysis based on the directional distance function of SBM. Financial Research, 367 (1), 110-130.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11676
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Canadian Social Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science
We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net,or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture