A Comparative Study of the Funding Resources for Public and Private Universities in the United States

Xiaowei ZHANG

Abstract


Top universities in the United States have several hundred years of history and have accumulated rich experience in raising school funds. This article first briefly introduces the funding resources available for these universities, followed by comparison of the funding for both public and private universities in the United States from five aspects: government funding, research grants, tuitions, donations, and other resources. Finally, based on the successful practices and experiences of American universities on funding, several suggestions are made to improve the funding mechanism of China ’s first-class universities, providing references for the construction of “double first-class” universities in China. Adequate funding is a must for building a world-class university. We need to establish and improve the funding mechanisms and apply business measures to school-running to ensure the sustainable and healthy development of the university in competition. Meanwhile, universities should improve their internal management and make overall plans for a more efficient use of the fund.

Keywords


Universities in the U. S.; School funding; Comparative study; Inspiration

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bai, D. (2002). The formation of popularization system of the full-time higher education in the United States: 1945-1970. Northeast Normal University.

Cui, S. (2013). The enlightenment of classified funding to Chinese private education. Renmin University of China Education Journal, (02), 151-161.

Li, Y. (2015). Analysis and inspiration of the change in the funding sources structure of world-class universities. Beijing Education (Higher Education), (12), 18-20.

Luo, Z. M. (2015). What does it take for a university to receive a huge donation. Guangming Daily, 2015-09-22 (013).

Wu, D. K. (2009). University development needs management. China Higher Education, (09), 51-53.

Wu, Z. L., & Zeng, X. D. (2003). An analysis of the path of entrepreneurship introduced to universities in the United States. International and Comparative Education, (12), 20-24.

Yuan, L. S., Liao, Z. Z., Li, Z. Y., et al. (2016). Why Is the proportion of China’s college professional expenditure so low?. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), (03), 26-37.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11396

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Canadian Social Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net,or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture