Canadian Social Science
Research on the Contract for the Benefit of Third Parties
Abstract
The relativity of contract has been one of the most important basic principles in the contract law. With the development of social economy, however, the relativity of contract is facing more and more challenges—the complexity of business transactions makes the execution of many contracts related to the third parties, and trying to use contracts to benefit the third parties has become especially common. In that case, several questions are aroused in theory such as whether the contract for the benefit of third parties is rational, and how to build the institution of the contract for the benefit of third parties and so on. Given this situation, this paper explained the rationality and legitimacy of the contract for the benefit of third parties. After comparing the legislative examples in many countries, the paper tried to establish the right system related to the contract for the benefit of third parties, and provided advice on Article 64 of Chinese Contract Law.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Corbin, A. L. (America) (1998).Corbin on Contracts (W. G. Wang, et al, trans. pp.177, 183, 197). Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.
Han, S. Y. (2004). Discussion on contracts executed by the third party: explanation of Article 64 of China’s Contract Law. Science of Law, (6).
Huang, M. S., & Zhang, Y. M. (2006). Research on Roman Contract System and Modern Contract Law (pp.107-109). Beijing: China Procurational Press.
Maine, H. S. (Britain). Ancient law (J. Shen, Trans., p.177). Beijing, The Commercial Pres. Cited from Research on Roman Contract System and Modern Contract Law (p.106). Beijing: China Procurational Press.
Medicus, D. (Germany) (2004). Allgemeiner Teil des BGB (J. L. Du & Z. Lu, trans., pp.25, 585). Beijing: Law Press.
Sun, S. Y. (1998). The Pandect of civil law (p. 612). Cited from Wang, Z. J., Research on civil law and its cases (Vol.7, p.162). Beijing: China University of Politic Science and Law Press.
Wagatsuma, S. (Japan) (2008). Lectures on Civil Law of Wagatsuma Sakae: Discussion on Creditor’s Rights, (H. Xu, Trans, Vol.1, pp.107, 114-116), Beijing: China Legal Publishing House..
Wang, L. M (2003). Research on contract law (p.55). Beijing: China Renmin University Press.
Wang, Y. (2003, May). Rights of the third party beneficiary of the contract of the third party’s interests. A master’s thesis of China University of Political science and Law.
Wang, Z. J. (1998). Research on civil law and its cases (Vol. 7, p.162). Beijing: China University of Politic Science and Law Press.
Yin, T. (1995). Modern contract law of France (p.283). Beijing: Law Press.
Yin, T. (2001). On contracts concerning the third party: discussion on Articles 64 and 65 of contract law. Chinese Journal of Law, (1).
Zhang, J. B. (2000). Principle of civil law (Vol.2, p.74). Beijing: China University of Politic Science and Law Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10951
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Canadian Social Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science
We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture 
