Reflection and Improvement of Litigation Relief in China's Administrative Contract Dispute Resolution

Qian LONG

Abstract


The clauses related to the administrative contracts in the new Administrative Litigation Law and the judicial interpretation about the administrative contracts in Interpretation of Applicability together constitute the normative basis of the current case hearing of the administrative contracts. However, in the current practice of judicial trials of administrative contracts, the intrinsic defects of the normative basis are gradually becoming more apparent. These defects specifically include the vagueness of the scope of case accepting, the unclarity of the normative application rules, and low operability etc. This article intends to reflect on the above defects. The author argues that it is necessary to define the scope of case accepting of administrative contracts based on positive and negative criteria. Within the subset of administrative litigation - the administrative contracts, discriminating the characteristics of differences disputes and making the disputes applicable to different normative application rules.


Keywords


Administrative contract; Scope of case accepting; Normative application; Nature of the dispute

Full Text:

PDF

References


Administrative Law Office of the Legal Affairs Working Committee of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress.(2018).The complete collection on the legislative background and viewpoints of the administrative litigation law (p.5). Law Press.

Jiang, B. X., & Liang, F. Y. (2016). Theory and practice of administrative litigation law (p.212) (3rd ed. Part. 1). Law Press.

Jiang, B. X., & Liang, F. Y. (2016). Theory and practice of administrative litigation law (pp.337-343) (3rd ed. Part. 1). Law Press.

Jiang, P. (Ed.). (2007). Civil Law (p.665). China University of Political Science and Law Press.

Liang, F. Y. (2017). Problems in the application of contract law in administrative agreement cases. China Law Review, (01).

Liu, F. (2018). Dispute resolution mechanism based on PPP agreement. International Symposium on Dispute Resolution between Government and Social Capital Cooperation Agreement. Guanghua Law School of Zhejiang University, http://www.ghls.zju.edu.cn/chinese/Redir.php?catalog_id=68&object_id=369001, accessed August 31, 2018.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10687

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Canadian Social Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net,or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture