Theories, Practices, Challenges, and the New Tendency in Connecting Reading and Writing

Zhanfang LI

Abstract


Since the 21th centuary, the similarity views of reading and writing started an ever-lasting enthusiasm for connecting reading and writing. The present paper reviewed the studies in the recent 20 years and categorized them into the following four aspects. First, theoretical investigations were mainly concerned with the dynamic relationships between reading and writing and the cultivation of critical thinking in the connection process. Secondly, contextualized practices from foreign language teachers gave adequate evidence of the possibility and necessity of the integration. Thirdly, in the integration task, various challenges were faced by both the language teachers and the students. Finally, in the digital age, the Computer-assisted language learning (CALL) and computer-mediated communication (CMC) inevitably started a new tendency.


Keywords


Reading and writing; Theories; Practices; Challenges; New tendency

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barks, D. (2001). Textual borrowing strategies for graduate-level ESL writers. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.). Linking literacies: perspectives on reading-writing connections (pp.246-267), Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., Richards, T. (2002). Reading and writing: connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Disabilities, 35(1), 39-56.

Bloch, J. (2001a). Plagiarism and the EFL student: from printed to electronic texts. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), Linking literacies: perspectives on reading-writing connections (pp.209-228), Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Bloch, J. (2001b). Implementing commonspace in the ESL composition classroom. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), Linking literacies: Perspectives on reading-writing connections (pp.309-333), Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Bloch, J. (2006). Blogging as a bridge between multiple forms of literacy: The use of blogs in an academic writing class. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp.288-309). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Carillo, E. C. (2015). Securing a place for reading in composition: The importance of teaching for transfer. Logan: Utah State University Press.

Cavdar, G., & Doe, S. (2012). Learning through writing: Teaching critical thinking skills in writing assignments. Political Science and Politics, 2, 298-306.

Condon, W., & Kelly-Riley, D. (2004). Assessing and teaching what we value: The relationship between college-level writing and critical thinking abilities. Assessing Writing, 9, 56-75.

Crossley, S. A., Rose, D. F., Danekes, C., Rose, C. W., McNamar, D. S. (2017). That noun phrase may be beneficial and this may not be: Discourse cohesion in reading and writing. Reading and Writing, 30 (3), 569-589.

Cumming, A. (2006). Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Cumming, A. (2013). Assessing integrated writing tasks for academic purposes: Promises and perils. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1,1-8.

Cumming, A., Lai, C., & Cho, H. (2016). Students’ writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23(9), 47-58.

DuBrowa, M. (2011). Integrating reading and writing: One professor’s story. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 28 (1), 30-33.

Elbow, P. (2004). Putting writing before reading is an effective approach to teaching and learning.Educational Leadership,5, 8-13.

Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39-50.

Fulford, A., Hodgson, N., Koappanou, A., Vlieghe, J. (2016). Technologies of reading and writing: Transformation and subjectivation in digital times. Educational Theory, 66 (4), 435-440.

Gao, Q. P. (2013). The development of Chinese English majors’ thinking in argumentative English writing. Beijing: Foreign Language Press.

Grabe, W. (2001). Reading-writing relations: Theoretical perspectives and Instructional Practices. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), Linking Literacies: perspectives on Reading-Writing Connections (pp.15-47). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

He, W. (2013). From English novel reading to English writing-Report on a LSA-driven EFL writing pedagogical experiment. Foreign Language Research, 5, 124-129.

He, W. (2015). A questionnaire report on Chinese EFL writing teachers: Their English novel reading and their writing instructions. Foreign Language Research, 186 (5), 128-131.

Hirvela, A. (2001). Connecting reading and writing through literature. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), Linking literacies: Perspectives on reading-writing connections (pp.109-134). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan press.

Hirvela, A., & Du, Q. (2013). “Why am I paraphrasing?”: Undergraduate ESL writers’ engagement with source-based academic writing and reading. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 87-98.

Hum, L. (2015). Reading to learn: Integrated reading and writing to teach academic writing course. Asian EFL Journal, 84(5), 66-79.

Keller, D. (2014). Chasing literacy: reading and writing in an age of acceleration. Utah Logan: Utah State University Press.

Laurie, A., Henry, J. C., O’ Byrne, W. L., & Zawilinski, L. (2012). Using peer collaboration to support online reading, writing, and communication: An empowerment model for struggling readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 28(3), 279-306.

Li, B. Y. (2012). A comparative study of the approaches for integrating reading and writing in China and America. Curriculum, teaching material and method, 32(10), 116-120.

Li, Z. F. (2014). Reading-to-write: A practice of critical thinking. The Journal of Arts and Humanities, 5, 67-71.

Littau, K. (2006). Theories of reading: Books, bodies, and bibliomania. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Lunsford, A. A. (2006). Writing, technologies, and the fifth cannon. Computers and Composition, 23: 169-177.

Mangen, A. (2016). What hands may tell us about reading and writing. Educational Theory, 66 (4), 457-477.

Parodi, G. (2007). Reading-writing connections: Discourse-oriented research. Reading and Writing, 20 (3), 225-250.

Patrick, S. D., Martirosyan, N. M., & Vick, N. T. (2016). NADE members respond: Best practices and challenges in integrated reading and writing. Journal of Developmental Education, 39(2), 32-34.

Pecorari, D. (2001). Plagiarism and international students: How the English-speaking university responds. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), Linking literacies: Perspectives on reading-writing connections (pp.229-245), Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Plakans, L. (2008). Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks. Assessing Writing, 13, 111-129.

Plakans, L., & Gebrial, A. (2013). Using multiple texts in an integrated writing assessment: Source text use as a predictor of score. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 217-230.

Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2012). A close investigating into source use in integrated second language writing tasks. Assessing Writing, 7, 18-34.

Rachel, S. M. (2004). Writing from sources: The effects of explicit instruction on college students processes and products. L1 educational studies in language and literature, 4(1), 5-33.

Saxton, E., Belinger, S., & Becker, W. (2012). The critical thinking analytic rubric (CTAR): Investigating intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a scoring mechanism for critical thinking performance assessments. Assessing Writing, 17, 251-270.

Shen, M. Y. (2009). Reading-writing connection for EFL college learners’ literacy development. Asian EFL Journal, 11(1), 87-106.

Tierney, R. J., &Shanahan, T. (1991). Research on the reading-writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), The Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 2) (pp.246-280), New York: Longman.

Truscott, J., & Sharwood, S. M. (2011). Input, intake, and consciousness: The quest for a theoretical foundation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 497-528.

Wang, C. M. (2012). The continuation task: An effective way of learning English. Foreign Language World, 5, 2-7.

Wang, C. M. (2014). Create contents and imitate forms: The basic principles of effective foreign language teaching and learning. Foreign Language World, 161 (2),42-48.

Wang, C. M. (2015). Why does the continuous task improve learning? Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 47 (5), 753-763.

Wang, C. M. (2016). Learning by extension. Modern foreign languages (bimonthly), 39 (6), 784-793.

Wang, C. M. (2017). From write-to-learn to learn-by-CEC. Foreign Language Teaching and Research (Bimonthly), 49 (4), 547-556.

Wang, C. M., & Yuan, L. X. (2013).A study of the continuation task as a proficiency test component. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 45 (5), 707-719.

Wang, C. M., Niu, R. Y., &Zheng, X. X. (2000).Improving English through writing.Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 32 (3), 207-212.

Wang, M., & Wang, C. M. (2014). The effect of alignment in the continuous task.Modern and Foreign Languages, 37 (4), 501-512.

Warschauer, M., Zheng, B. B., & Park, Y. M. (2013). New ways of connecting reading and writing. TESOL Quarterly,47 (4), 825-830.

Weissberg, R. (2013). Critically thinking about critical thinking. Acad. Quest,26, 317-328.

Williams, J. (2006). The speaking-writing connection in second language and academic literary development. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection: perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp.10-25), Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Zhang, X. L. (2009). An interface between critical thinking and reading-to-writing Instruction. Journal of the Second Foreign Languages of Beijing, 174(10), 73-78.

Zhou, L., & Peerasak, S. (2010). The impact of task-based writing upon reading. Foreign Language and Teaching, 6, 53-56.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10458

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Canadian Social Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture