Improving Public Security Administrative Mediation System in China
Abstract
Public security administrative mediation is an important part of Chinese administrative legal system. It plays an important role in maintaining social order and stability, and preventing and resolving social disputes. A positive attitude by public security authorities towards social disputes is very important, while if public security authorities use its power to lead mediation to a certain way, or force mediation onto the disputants, the impacts can be quite negative. Public security should use administrative mediation on a wide range of civil disputes, and regulate the use of mediation through the establishment of appropriate procedures and disclosure of information and process related to the mediation. The court should also strengthen its monitoring and oversight of administrative mediation. Rather than reviewing the specific disputes that were mediated, the court should focus on whether mediation was conducted under the free will of the disputants, whether mediation results reflect an agreement by the disputants, whether mediation was carried out according to legal procedures, and whether mediation results were detrimental to public interests or the lawful interest of
others.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Gao, W. Y. (2008). Research on the police mediation system. Journal of Chinese People’s Public Security University (Social Science Edition), (4).
Huang, W. (2011). On public security mediation in response to citizens’ needs. Journal of Fujian Police College, (6).
Huang, Z. Z. (2008). Simple administration of centralized power-semi-official grassroots administration based on quasi-officials and dispute resolution in China. Open Times, (2).
Hui, S. W. (1996). On public security administrative mediation. Law Science, (1).
Liu, P. F. (2014). Thinking over the dilemma and the way out for the public security mediation work of police Station. Public Security Research, (3).
Meng, J. Z. (2008, November 24). Prevention first, mediation first: Resolving conflicts and disputes from the source. People’s Daily.
Ministry of Public Security. (2010, Ocotober 5). Public security organs made significant achievements in public security mediation. Retrieved 2015, March 17 from http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2010-10/05/content_1715777.htm
Pei, Z. B., & Zhang, S. P. (2009). Public security mediation practice survey report in liaoning province. Journal of Liaoning Public Security and Judicial Administration Institute, (1).
Wang, B. (2010). Reflection and improvement of administrative security mediation. Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College, (3).
Yu, D. M., & Ding, Z. G. (2014). Public security administrative mediation. Beijing: People’s Public Security University Press.
Zuo, W. M., et al. (2010). Research on the resolution of grass-roots disputes in China. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10075
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Canadian Social Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science
We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net,or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture