The Humanistic Concern and Its Socio-Spatial Distribution of Modern Environmental Ethic
Abstract
The global ecological crisis of twenty-first Century has sounded the alarm for human beings. The developed area as well as developing country realized that ecoenvironment deterioration would take a deadly toll from us. Therefore, they made various laws and regulations to protect the ecological environment and natural resources, and also began to seek for a unity where human can live in harmony with nature. Under this circumstance, environmental ethics, which refers to the ethic relationship between people and the ecological environment, emerge as the times require. As based on axiology, the environmental ethics research carries a mission to affirm intrinsic value of human and transformation value of nature equally. Whereas man has the moral obligation to care about the nature which is an indispensable member of the life union, the intrinsic value of human is nontransferable and also unnecessary. We are not supposed to marginalize the ethics concern of human just because we are conscious of care for nature. Therefore, this study tried to illuminate the essence of the humanistic concern and its socio-spatial distribution of modern environmental ethic. Then the study analyzed the necessity of humanistic concern in environmental ethic research, and draw our attention that how important to pay attention to the socio-spatial distribution of ethic concern. Finally, the paper discussed two kinds of theories and realistic paths of ethic concern in specific environmental practice.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chen, W. W. (2011). The human technologization: The technical construction of man’s essence power. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition), (6), 72-76.
Drenthen, M., et al. (2013). Old world and new world perspectives in environmental philosophy. Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
Gong, W. J. (2014). Socio-spatial distribution of environmental risk in population. Journal of Xiamen University (Arts & Social Sciences), (3), 49-58.
Li, D. H. (2013). Values of our times. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
LI, H. L., et al. (2014). Theoretical analysis of “eco-man” in sight of ecological civilization. Cross-Cultural Communication, 10(6), 72-76
Retnowati, A., et al. (2014). Environmental ethics in local knowledge responding to climate change. Procedia Environmental Sciences, (20), 785-794.
Tao, L. Q. (2009). Social ecological analysis and policy selection for environmental vulnerable group. Nanjing: Ecology Department of Nanjing Forestry University.
Yang, T. J. (2007). Environmental ethic: Global discourse, Chinese perspective. Chongqing: Chongqing publishing group.
Zhang, J. M. (2014). The ecological philosophy of Marx and Engels. Beijing: China Social Sciences Publishing House.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/7693
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Liang YAO, Daojin SUN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Remind
We are currently accepting submissions via email only.
The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to ccc@cscanada.net,or ccc@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture